The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
Next to the calculation of the circumference, the calculation of the
superficial contents of a circle by means of its radius or diameter is
perhaps most important; that is, the computation of how much area that
part of a plane which lies within a circle measures. This calculation
is called the "numerical quadrature." It depends, however, upon the
problem of numerical rectification; that is, upon the calculation of
the magnitude of π. For it is demonstrated in elementary geometry,
that the area of a circle is equal to the area of a triangle produced
by drawing in the circle a radius, erecting at the extremity of the
same a tangent,—that is, in this case, a perpendicular,—cutting off
upon the latter the length of the circumference, measuring from the
extremity, and joining the point thus obtained with the centre of the
circle. But it follows from this that the area of a circle is as many
times larger than the square upon its radius as the number π amounts to.
#Constructive rectification and quadrature.#
The numerical rectification and numerical quadrature of the circle
based upon the computation of the number π, are to be clearly
distinguished from problems that require a straight line equal in
length to the circumference of a circle, or a square equal in area
to a circle, to be _constructively_ produced out of its radius or
its diameter; problems which might properly be called "constructive
rectification" or "constructive quadrature." Approximately, of
course, by employing an approximate value for π these problems are
easily solvable. But to solve a problem of construction, in geometry,
means to solve it with mathematical exactitude. If the value π were
exactly equal to the ratio of two whole numbers to one another, the
constructive rectification would present no difficulties. For example,
suppose the circumference of a circle were exactly 3-1/7 times greater
than its diameter; then the diameter could be divided into seven equal
parts, which could be easily done by the principles of planimetry with
ruler and compasses; then we would produce to the amount of such a
part a straight line exactly three times larger than the diameter, and
should thus obtain a straight line exactly equal to the circumference
of the circle. But as a matter of fact, and as has actually been
demonstrated, there do not exist two whole numbers, be they ever so
great, that exactly represent by their proportion to one another the
number π. Consequently, a rectification of the kind just described does
not attain the object desired.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account