The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
Again, it is reported that the mathematician Hippias of Elis invented
a curved line that could be made to serve a double purpose: first,
to trisect an angle, and second, to square the circle. This curved
line is the τετραγωνίστουσα so often mentioned by the later Greek
mathematicians, and by the Romans called "quadratrix." Regarding the
nature of this curve we have exact knowledge from Pappus. But it will
be sufficient, here, to state that the quadratrix is not a circle
nor a portion of a circle, so that its construction is not possible
by means of the postulates enumerated in the preceding section. And
therefore the solution of the quadrature of the circle founded on the
construction of the quadratrix is not an elementary solution in the
sense discussed in the last section. We can, it is true, conceive a
mechanism that will draw this curve as well as compasses draw a circle;
and with the assistance of a mechanism of this description the squaring
of the circle is solvable with exactitude. But if it be allowed to
employ in a solution an apparatus especially adapted thereto, every
problem may be said to be solvable. Strictly taken, the invention
of the curve of Hippias substitutes for one insuperable difficulty
another equally insuperable. Some time afterwards, about the year 350,
the mathematician Dinostratus showed that the quadratrix could also
be used to solve the problem of rectification, and from that time on
this problem plays almost the same rôle in Grecian mathematics as the
related problem of quadrature.
#The Sophists' solution.#
As these problems gradually became known to the non-mathematicians of
Greece, attempts at solution at once sprang up that are worthy of a
place by the side of the solutions of modern amateur circle-squarers.
The Sophists, especially, believed themselves competent by seductive
dialectic to take a stronghold that had defied the intellectual
onslaughts of the greatest mathematicians. With verbal nicety,
amounting to puerility, it was said that the squaring of the circle
depended upon the finding of a number which represented in itself
both a square and a circle; a square by being a square number, a
circle in that it ended with the same number as the root number from
which, by multiplication with itself, it was produced. The number 36,
accordingly, was, as they thought, the one that embodied the solution
of the famous problem.
#Antiphon's attempt.#
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account