The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
[53] Professor Mach in thus speaking of bodies uses the
word in the sense of representations and not in the sense
of objects represented. He calls them in the sentence next
following "thought-symbols for complexes of sensations
(complexes of elements)."
And, certainly, we do not deny that upon a closer analysis the
perception of a tree appears as a bundle, or a complex of sensations;
there is the green of the leaves, the color of the bark, the different
shades of the color indicating its bodily form, the shape of the
branches, and their slight motions in the breeze that gently shakes the
tree. Yet the perception of a tree does not consist of these sensations
alone. All these sensations might be so many isolated sensations; and
if they remained isolated, they would not produce the percept of a
tree. These sensations are interpreted; they have acquired a meaning
and are combined into a unity. It is this unity which constitutes the
perception of a tree. This unity has grown from sensations; and that
process which develops and, as we have learned, naturally must develop
sensations from sense-impressions, and from sensations perceptions
that are representative of a group of facts outside of the perceptions
themselves,—that process we define as mind-activity.
What does the 'perception of a tree' mean? It means that if the person
perceiving it moves in a certain direction and over a certain distance,
he will have certain sensations which upon the whole can be correctly
anticipated. Every perception and also every sensation contains a
number of anticipations. The perception of a tree is in so far to be
considered correct, as the anticipations which it contains, and of
which it actually consists, can be realised. If and in so far as these
anticipations when realised tally with the perception, if and in so far
as they justify it, or can justify it, if and in so far as they fulfil
the expectations produced by the perception, if and in so far as they
make no alteration of the perception necessary, but being in agreement
with it confirm the representation it conveys: the perception is said
to be true. Moreover, we can predict similar results with regard to
beings of a similar constitution.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account