The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
[21] Hermann Grassmann, one of the founders of modern mathematics, has
called attention to the fact that Euclid had a clearer conception of the
fundamental concepts of mathematics than his ill-informed translators
and interpreters. Grassmann says in his _Ausdehnungslehre_: “From the
imputation of confounding axioms with assumed concepts Euclid himself,
however, is free, Euclid incorporated the former among his postulates
(αἰτήματα) while he separated the latter as common concepts (κοιναὶ
ἐννοιαι)—a proceeding which even on the part of his commentators was no
longer understood, and likewise with modern mathematicians, unfortunately
for science, has met with little imitation. As a matter of fact, the
abstract methods of mathematical science know no axioms at all.”—Quoted
from _The Open Court_, Vol. II. No. 77, _A Flaw in the Foundation of
Geometry_, by Hermann Grassmann, translated from his _Ausdehnungslehre_
by μκρκ.
BOOK REVIEWS.
BELIEF IN GOD. Its Origin, Nature, and Basis. Being the Winkley Lectures
of the Andover Theological Seminary for the Year 1890. By _Jacob Gould
Schurmann_. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. 1890.
The learned Sage Professor of Philosophy in Cornell University, after
tracing the historical origin and development of the belief in God,
expresses his conviction that the problem of the modern theist consists
in the union of the Aryan and Semitic modes of interpreting existence. We
shall then have “a synthesis of the Father of all spirits with the ground
of all nature.” This is the hypothesis developed in the course of the
lectures delivered by Professor Schurmann last year before the Andover
Theological Seminary on the Winkley foundation, that form the contents of
the present volume. The theism embodied in that hypothesis is called by
the author _anthropocosmic_, because, while it is based on the facts of
the universe and those of human nature, the universe must be interpreted
in the terms of man, and not man in the terms of the universe. The key
to the universe is the self-conscious spirituality which makes us selves
and persons. Hence anthropocosmic theism is the doctrine of a Supreme
Being “who is ground both of nature and of man, but whose essence is not
natural but spiritual.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account