The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
But the value of the Bible, in our opinion, does not depend
upon the acceptance or rejection of these or those historical data; nor
is it necessary to consider the Hebrew prophets as special revelations
of God, in contradistinction to the divine revelation in nature and the
history of mankind in general. It may be true enough that the orthodox
God-idea of Monotheism depends upon the belief in special revelation
and prophecies, and it is also true that most of the Biblical criticism
has been destructive and negative. But there is a way possible between
both standpoints which may be called positive criticism. This positive
criticism attempts to understand the very life and meaning of the old
religion, it attempts to comprehend the belief of the orthodox and
construe it in the terms of science—i. e. of rational and clear thought.
Religion is certainly not a mere fraud or a vain illusion, it is an
ideal which developed naturally out of certain needs of man and the
conditions of society. That religious ideas, especially the idea of God
as the cosmic power which represents the moral authority, are no mere
fictions, is proved by their survival, and those who believe in evolution
should not be blind to the fact that there is something good, something
true, something well adapted to surroundings in religion. To find these
elements of truth and goodness which constitute the life of religion
is not mere negative criticism, but positive criticism, and it is not
at all necessary for those who aspire in this direction, to believe in
any historical data, or in special revelations, or in prophecies, or in
the personality of God, but simply to trust in truth. Truth is the only
way of salvation even though it may shatter the most sacred idols of a
venerable orthodoxy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account