The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
Professor Cattell objects that the theories of Darwin and Spencer on the
origin of music, describe what probably took place, rather than explain
why it was necessary that it should have taken place. As to Spencer’s
explanation of harmony, he affirms that it amounts to saying that harmony
gives pleasure because it is pleasant. After referring to the connection
of harmony with the existence of overtones, Prof. Cattell states that
music is not, as commonly supposed, a creation of the imagination, freer
than the other arts from a physical basis, but is rather a discovery and
a development. All the combinations of music are latent in the sounds Of
nature, and the history of music bears witness to the gradual adoption of
such as are more remote. The difference in voices rests on the overtones
present, and the immense emotional effects of music are due to the fact
that music expresses the emotion of the human voice, using and developing
those combinations of tones which the voice uses when moved by sorrow and
joy, despair and exultation.
By the _Coefficient_ of External Reality, Professor Baldwin means the
something which attaches to some presentations in virtue of which we
attribute reality to them; while others, not having the coefficient,
are discredited. Diametrically opposed solutions of this question
are held. To one class of writers, the coefficient of the reality
of an image is its independence of the will; to another class, the
coefficient is subjection to the will. If we make a distinction between a
memory-coefficient of reality—that is, the something about a memory which
leads us to believe it represents a real experience—and a sensational
coefficient, that is, the criterion of present sensational reality, we
see that those two kinds of reality differ in their relation to the
will. A present sensible reality is not under the control of any will,
but a memory coefficient is subjected to will, in the sense that we
are able to get the image again as a sensation by repeating the series
of voluntary muscular sensations which were associated with it in its
first experience. This memory-coefficient of external reality must be
distinguished from the coefficient of memory itself; the latter being
the feeling that an image has been in consciousness before, i. e.
recognition, or sense of familiarity. A true memory is an image which I
can get at will by a train of memory-associates, and which, when got, is
further subject to my will. (London: Williams & Norgate.)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS. July, 1891. Vol. I. NO. 4.
CONTENTS:
THE MODERN CONCEPTION OF THE SCIENCE OF RELIGION. By Prof.
_Edward Caird_.
THE FUNCTIONS OF ETHICAL THEORY. By Prof. _James H. Hyslop_.
THE MORALITY OF NATIONS. By Prof. _W. R. Sorley_.
J. S. MILL’S SCIENCE OF ETHOLOGY. By _James Ward_.
VICE AND IMMORALITY. By _R. W. Black_.
THE PROGRESS OF POLITICAL ECONOMY SINCE ADAM SMITH. By _Francis
W. Newman_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account