The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
In the form of a dialogue M. Milhaud meets the objections made to the
notion of limit in Mathematics. The question whether to have a limit,
for anything variable, is not synonymous with attaining a limit, is
considered in connection with Zeno’s problem of Achilles and the
tortoise, the strict solution of which is, not that Achilles will
never overtake the tortoise, but that he will not overtake it on this
side of a spot situated at a distance of 10/9 of a metre from the
starting-point, within a period equal to 10/9 of a second commencing
at the instant of starting. To the objection that by its very nature
the limit cannot be attained, as where the limit and the variable
element which indefinitely approaches it are essentially different,
it is replied that when a variable element has a limit, this element
is a _quantity_ and the limit is a quantity of the same kind, quality
being neglected. In the proposition: the length of the circumference is
the limit of the perimeters of the inscribed polygons, the limit is a
quantity of the same kind, that of length. It is not necessary to know
whether the definition accords with reality. M. Milhaud then shows by
reference to the properties of an unlimited series of inscribed polygons
and the corresponding circumscribed polygons, that two such series of
geometrical lengths satisfying the required conditions can always be
considered as defining a new length, superior to all the first and
inferior to all the others. As to its existence, it can be said only
that a length exists only as determined, as limited; and a state of
length, or a particular length has a right to exist, provided that the
properties of quantity which condition it are not contradictory. The
essence of mathematical space, breadth, length is only the content of
their definitions. Mathematics owes its existence to the condition of
creating for itself a world of fictions. There is a divergence of opinion
as to whether incommensurables should be represented by lengths or by
numerical symbols, but the divergence is a last echo of the endless
discussions which the notions of infinity and continuity have raised
among mathematicians.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account