The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
There are articles on the freedom of will, on the infinite
number of possibilities, mongolian cosmology, Pascal’s position toward
scepticism, analogies between cognition of God and cognition of nature
with special reference to Kant’s criticism of the evidences of the
existence of God. The present number of vol. iv contains an article on
the chemico-physical theory of atoms. The question is proposed whether or
not this theory contains contradictions. The author starts from Dalton’s
Definition, whom he regards together with Wallaston as the founder of
modern atomism. The four weightiest objections are considered, but
the author arrives at the conclusion that all of them are based upon
misconceptions. He sums up: “Chemists and Physicists do not repudiate
eyes and senses when proposing and defending the atomistic theory. On
the contrary they use for their view and build it upon an exceedingly
richer material of observation than is employed by their antagonists....
This denial of the validity of the most important objections, however,
does not imply that the atomistic theory is without difficulties, gaps,
unexplained details, etc. It is not as yet so certain a fact as for
instance the heliocentric world-conception. It is an hypothesis still and
will have to remain such for quite a long time. Yet we can confidently
assert that the difficulties are by far less than those offered to
the acceptance of the Copernican hypothesis at the time of the first
condemnation of Galileo (1616) which were solved afterward by Galileo in
the year 1632. We have further to state that the atomistic theory has
been developed more and more since Dalton, the number and the importance
of the explanations offered in it have constantly increased.”
Dr. Frye of Jena discusses Preyer’s latest view of “The Self-Gubernation
of Life—_Die Selbststeuerung des Lebens_” which appeared in a recent
number of the _Naturwissenschaftliche Wochenschrift_ (Berlin). Preyer
considers his newly discovered law as a corollary to the conservation
of matter and energy and maintains that the total amount of life in the
world is as much constant as are matter and energy. Living mass (_Mz_)
plus inanimate mass (_Mn_) are constant (_C_); _Mz_ + _Mn_ = _C_. So
far scientists will agree, but Preyer adds that each separate item is
constant for itself. He declares that “the total amount of protoplasm
in the world remains unchanged in quantity.” It is hardly probable that
Preyer’s view will be adopted by science.
Dr. Grupp discusses the logical paths of thought, and the editor,
Professor Dr. Gutberlet explains and criticises Wundt’s System of
Philosophy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account