The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
The term “thing in itself” means originally the object as it is,
independent of the thinking subject’s cognition. For instance: A rainbow
appears in the clouds; the rainbow is not a thing in itself, but the
appearance of a thing in itself. The rainbow exists in man’s sensibility
only. The colors of the spectrum, indeed all colors, the colors of the
sky, of the clouds, of trees, of living beings, are sensations only;
they are subjective phenomena, they are certain kinds of feelings
representing objective realities, but they are not these objective
realities themselves. They are perceived in the brain and are projected
to a place outside the organism. The rainbow, as it is seen, is not a
thing, but it is something seen, it is an appearance only. And this is
true of all things seen and heard and perceived by any one of the senses.
The sense-pictures are localised in space, they are projected outside to
a spot where the combined experience of the senses has taught a sentient
being to expect them. But all the objects of the objective world as they
are perceived are and remain subjective sense-perceptions. The world of
our senses around us is woven of our sensations. It is mere appearance.
This is not a question concerning which there is any doubt, this is
simply a matter of fact. But the question arises, “Can we know things as
they are independent of sensation? Can we know things in themselves?”
The physicist and every scientist is engaged with the problem, What are
natural phenomena independent of sensation? Light is a sensation of
vision, but what is the objective process that takes place when a human
eye perceives light? The physicist answers this problem by eliminating
in his mind the sense-element and by describing the facts of the process
in terms of matter and motion. His answer is that light, objectively
considered, is a certain vibration of the ether. If we can rely upon
physical science, the thing in itself of a rainbow would be a certain
refraction of ether-waves. These vibrations of the ether-waves are
transmitted from the sun, and being broken in the falling raindrops
actually take place independent of cognition, they are real whether we
look at them or not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account