The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 2, 1891-1892 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
It has often happened to me when taking a constitutional to ask my way
and discover that I am addressing a person who neither understands
nor speaks French, though, as a rule, all peasants understand French
and the vast majority can speak the language too, but after a rather
sorry fashion. A foreigner finds at least one comfort in all this: in
Languedoc he uses the national tongue more correctly than thousands of
native born Frenchmen! Nor is the knowledge of patois confined to the
peasantry or the working classes of the towns. The _bourgeoisie_, with
exceedingly rare exceptions, are quite at home in it, and the children
of the nobility often prattle with their peasant nurse more easily in
patois than in the polished speech of their parents. During a political
campaign, it is a very common thing for a would-be deputy to address
country voters in their familiar dialect, thereby gaining the favor not
alone of the _félibres_; while, during this same period of electoral
excitement, the local papers publish almost daily editorials written in
patois. In hundreds of rural churches the short sermon after early mass
is preached in patois, and many a time I have found myself turning with
surprise when I heard French spoken in the streets of Languedocian towns
of considerable size.
There was a time when the government and the ruling classes of Languedoc
itself strove to eradicate these dialects and to substitute French
for them. The aim was a patriotic one; greater national unity, it was
believed, would thus be secured. But that period has gone by, and at
present there is a strong tendency to preserve from destruction these
linguistic souvenirs of a rapidly fading past. What the enthusiastic
_félibres_ would do for Provençal, they and their disciples and imitators
in Languedoc would do for the dialects of South Western France. At the
Congrès d’Etudes Languedociennes, held recently at Montpellier, one of
the members proposed that the French language should be taught in the
primary schools through the medium of the langue d’oc. The suggestion
is not so chimerical as it appears to be at first blush, for one of the
greatest and never-ending difficulties of the country schoolmaster in
this part of France is to teach his scholars the three R’s by means of
the French, which is a foreign tongue to ninety-nine out of a hundred
of them. One is not surprised, therefore, to find that one of the
resolutions passed by this same Congress takes up the plan proposed in
the paper just referred to, and declares in favor of “the utilisation of
the langue d’oc for teaching French in the primary schools.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account