The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
Farewell, great heart, and great leader! On your coffin I laid a wreath
of immortelles for friendship, for the homage of America, and for the
sake of this free English Society. For your victory is ours also: your
triumph is that of every independent mind on earth.
MONCURE D. CONWAY.
INTUITION AND REASON.
The question whether we act more frequently from intuition or reason,
and the question that follows it, which faculty is the more noble
guide to conduct, would have no more interest for the general public
than any other of the subjects which the metaphysician exercises his
ingenuity upon,—than the question, for instance, whether we execute a
greater number of analytic or of synthetic judgments in the course of
the day,—were it not that there is an ancient opinion to the effect that
reason and intuition are marks respectively of the manner of working of
men’s and of women’s minds. The opinion is wholly unfounded, and could
only have had its origin at a time when the psychology of the working of
the human mind was thoroughly misunderstood. As the very terms in which
the opinion is expressed make plain, it dates from the period when it
was the custom to speak of the human mind as having a lot of separate
“faculties” under its control, and of calling up now one and now another
of them to do its bidding. It is time that the belief in the different
quality of men’s and of women’s minds should follow the whole antiquated
machinery of “faculties” into the limbo of old and worn-out fashions of
thought and of speech.
This illusion, however, like most of the illusions that have had a firm
foot-hold in their day, has a perfectly comprehensible reason for its
existence. It is not true that men’s minds and women’s minds have a
different way of working; but it is true that upon certain occasions
(and by far, the greatest number of occasions) we all—men, women, and
negroes alike—act from intuition, and that the circumstances of women’s
lives have hitherto been such as to make their interests lie somewhat
more exclusively in those regions in which conduct is intuitive than in
those in which it is long thought out. It is not true that the Creator
has made two separate kinds of mind for men and for women; but it is true
that society, as at present constituted, offers two somewhat separate
_fields of interest_ for men and for women, and that the nature of their
conduct is of necessity determined by the character of the action which
is demanded of them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account