The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
That women have no deficiency in the power of putting this and that
together, when _this_ and _that_ are pieces of knowledge which are in
their possession, is absolutely proved by a single circumstance. Geometry
is a branch of learning which is entirely built up out of abstract
reason, pure and undefiled. Geometry is studied, in the United States, in
high schools, and it must not be forgotten that there are in this country
(according to the Report of the Bureau of Education) _three times_ as
many girls as boys who take the high school course. It cannot be said,
therefore, (as is said of girls who go to college) that the girls who go
to the high school are a selected lot; they are the very bone and fibre
of the women who make up the country. Now if women could not reason, we
ought to hear a great hue and cry from the teachers of the geometry
classes about the difficulty of teaching that subject to girls, and the
girls ought to lament and moan over the impossibility of getting safely
through with their demonstrations. Is this the case? I have never met
with a teacher of geometry who thought his boys did better than his
girls,—I have met with several who thought the reverse. As long ago as
1865, Her Majesty’s Inspector of schools, after travelling through this
country, said: “The teachers all tell me that the girls do fully as well
as the boys in mathematics,—fully.” Nor are any sad effects noticeable
upon health or spirits. Day after day an army of girls goes smiling into
the class-room and comes smiling out, utterly unaware that an unnatural
wrench has been given to their delicate minds, and that they are being
rapidly transformed into monstrous products of over-reason.
If girls show no defect in reason in the class-room, neither do boys show
any defect in intuition,—in fact, their intuition about stretched strings
and lines on balls are usually better than those of girls. I have kept
a record for many years of errors committed by boys and by girls, and I
have not been able to detect any difference in their character. It is
true that it was a boy who once failed to get a problem in trigonometry
for a week, because it was not expressly stated in the book that the
milestones to which the problem related were a mile apart. My intimate
acquaintance with the character of his mind prevented me, however, from
attributing this failure in intuition to his superior reasoning powers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account