The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazineVarious
Philosophy
The Monist, Vol. 3, 1892-1893 : $b A quarterly magazine
Various
Philosophy -- Periodicals
We are told by Professor Royce in the preface to this book, that we are
indebted for it to the lady friend to whom it is gracefully dedicated,
who asked him “for some account of the more significant spiritual
possessions of a few prominent modern thinkers,” to be related “in
comparatively brief and untechnical fashion.” The larger portion of the
work is taken up with that subject, exhibiting the general growth of
modern philosophical thought beginning with Spinozism, and terminating
with Monism as the outcome of the doctrine of Evolution. The author’s
purpose is constructive, however, as well as expository. He has his own
philosophical creed, suggested by what he knows of the progress and
outcome of modern thought, and the second portion of the work is the
expression of his thoughts on the world-conception which he regards as
embodying the true spirit of modern philosophy. Professor Royce justly
lays stress on the fact that the theory of evolution is the product
of a genuine and continuous growth. He dwells particularly, moreover,
on the distinction between the _epistemological_ sense of idealism,
which “involves a theory of the nature of our human knowledge,” and
its _metaphysical_ sense, in which it is “a theory as to the nature
of the real world, however we may come to know that nature.” It is in
accord with the latter sense that Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, and their
allies, as believing matter to be an expression of the world-spirit, are
referred to as the idealistic school; and it is in the metaphysical and
not the epistemological sense that the term idealism has been used since
Hegel. The opposite of a metaphysical idealist is “one who maintains
the ultimate existence of wholly unspiritual realities at the basis
of experience and as the genuine truth of the world—such unspiritual
realities for instance as an absolute ‘Unknowable,’ or, again, as what
Hobbes meant by ‘Body.’” This is not, however, the view of the author,
who thinks that the metaphysical idealist alone is in possession of a
successful solution for the epistemological problem.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account