The Moon: A Popular TreatiseServiss, Garrett Putman
Science
The Moon: A Popular Treatise
Serviss, Garrett Putman
Moon
“Not the least. At any rate there is no scientific evidence whatever for
such statements, and no probability that they are based on facts. They
are the result of faulty observation, misled by coincidences. It is
_imaginable_ that the light of the moon might have some influence upon
vegetable growth if it were an original kind of light coming from the
moon herself. But moonlight is only reflected sunlight, and when we
examine it with the spectroscope we do not find that the rays of light
in visiting the moon and returning thence to the earth have had either
anything added to or anything taken away from them, except intensity.
The total amount of light reflected from the moon upon the earth is
estimated to be about 1/618000 of the total amount that comes to us from
the sun. Curiously enough the moon appears to reflect proportionally
more heat than light, the amount of lunar heat received by the earth
being reckoned at 1/185000 of the amount coming from the sun. The
popular idea that the moon affects the movement of sap in plants is
equally illusory.”
“But about the weather? I know people who believe that a change of the
moon from one phase to another brings about a change of weather. Is that
true?”
“Certainly it is not true. The moon is changing its apparent form all
the time. There is no sudden alteration at any phase. The popular
belief, however, has always been so firmly fixed that many
investigations have been made to ascertain whether there is, in reality,
any foundation for it. These investigations have shown that no
measurable effect of the kind exists.”
“And the Full Moon does not drive away clouds, as some assert?”
“Surely she does not. I will now tell you something that the persons who
plant and sow and cut timber according to the phases of the moon, and
who believe that she exercises a kind of magic control over the clouds,
probably have never heard of, although if they knew it they might use it
as an argument in favor of lunar influences. It is this: The alternate
approach and retreat of the moon with respect to the earth, as she
travels round her elliptical orbit, produce measurable, although slight,
disturbances of the magnetism of our planet. The distance of the moon
varies to the extent of about 30,000 miles. Now, if it could be shown
that these magnetic disturbances were reflected in the character of the
weather, then the supposed influence of the moon would be established.
But that has not been shown, and if it were shown it would still be
found that the phases of the moon had no relation to the fact, for the
moon may be at its greatest or its least distance from the earth, or at
any intermediate distance during any possible phase.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account