_Superstition_ is distinguished by a lack of organization both in man and
his environment. It is a direct cross-relationship between an elementary
interest, passion, or need, and some isolated and capricious natural
power. The deity is externally related to the worshipper, having private
interests of his own which the worshipper respects {233} only from
motives of prudence. Religious observance takes the form of barter or
propitiation--_do ut des, do ut abeas_. The method of superstition is
arbitrary, furthermore, in that it is defined only by the liking or
aversion of an unprincipled agency.
Let us consider briefly the type of superstition which is associated with
the most primitive stage in the development of society.[8] The
worshipper has neither raised nor answered the ethical question as to
what is his greatest good. Indeed, he is much more concerned to meet the
pressing needs of life than he is to co-ordinate them or understand to
what they lead. He can not even be said to be actuated by the principle
of rational self-interest. Like the brute, whose lot is similar to his
own, he feels his wants severally, and is forced to meet them as they
arise or be trampled under foot in the struggle for existence. There is
little co-ordination of his interests beyond that which is provided for
in the organic and social structure with which nature has endowed him.
Over and above the instinct of self-preservation he recognizes in custom
the principle of tribal or racial solidarity. But this is proof, not so
much of a recognition of community of interest, as of the vagueness of
his ideas concerning the boundaries of his own self-hood. The very fact
that his interests are scattering and loosely knit prevents him from
clearly {234} distinguishing his own. He readily identifies himself not
only with his body, but with his clothing, his habitation, and various
trinkets which have been accidentally associated with his life. It is
only natural that he should similarly identify himself with those other
beings like himself with whom he is connected by the bonds of blood and
of intimate contact. Morally, then, primitive man is an indefinite and
incoherent aggregate of interests which have not yet assumed the form
even of individual and community purpose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account