The Moravians in Georgia, 1735-1740Fries, Adelaide L. (Adelaide Lisetta)
History
The Moravians in Georgia, 1735-1740
Fries, Adelaide L. (Adelaide Lisetta)
Moravians -- Georgia
In Rotterdam, Dr. Koker showed the party much kindness, while at Baron
von Watteville’s in Ysselstein, they were received “as at home”. At
Amsterdam, they joined in the meeting of the “societies” established
under Moravian influences, and from there proceeded to Cologne, and
up the Rhine to Frankfort. Having neglected to supply themselves with
passports, they experienced much difficulty whenever they reached a
walled city, sometimes being refused admittance altogether, and at other
times being allowed to enter only after much delay, which caused Wesley
to “greatly wonder that common sense and common humanity do not put an
end to this senseless, inhuman usage of strangers.” When any of their
number had an acquaintance in the city to which they had come they
sent in a note to him, and he would arrange for their entrance, and at
Frankfort they applied to Peter Boehler’s father, who entertained them
“in the most friendly manner.”
On Tuesday, July 15th, they reached Marienborn, where Wesley remained
for fifteen days, and Ingham for about seven weeks.
From Marienborn, Wesley went to Herrnhut, stopping at Erfurt, Weimar,
Jena, Halle, Leipsig and Dresden on the way. He remained at Herrnhut
twelve days, and then returned by the same route to Marienborn, and to
England.
This trip to Germany has been given as the beginning of the breach
between Wesley and the Moravians, but it is doubtful whether such was
really the case. In the “Memoirs of James Hutton” it is stated that
Wesley was offended because Ingham was admitted to the Communion at
Marienborn, while permission was refused him, and that he secretly
brooded over the injury, but Wesley himself does not mention the
occurrence, and refers to Marienborn as a place where he met what he
“sought for, viz.: living proofs of the power of faith,” and where he
stayed twelve days longer than he at first intended. The tone of his
account of Herrnhut is also distinctly friendly, though he did not
unreservedly accept two or three theological statements made to him, but
the long conversations he records prove his joy at finding sympathy, and
confirmation of what he wanted to believe concerning justification by
faith, and the fact that a weak faith was still a real faith, and as
such should be cherished and strengthened, not despised. He could not
have been greatly influenced against the Moravians by his visit to
Halle, for each time he stayed but one night, and on the first occasion
Professor Francke was not at home, nor were their arguments new to him,
that they should have impressed him deeply.
It frequently happens that when a controversy has arisen between
friends, both parties look backward and read into former words and
deeds a meaning they did not have at the time they transpired, and most
probably this is what has happened in regard to the trip to Germany and
its effect on Wesley.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account