The Mormon Prophet and His Harem: Or, An Authentic History of Brigham Young, His Numerous Wives and ChildrenWaite, C. V. (Catherine Van Valkenburg)
History
The Mormon Prophet and His Harem: Or, An Authentic History of Brigham Young, His Numerous Wives and Children
Waite, C. V. (Catherine Van Valkenburg)
Latter Day Saint churches; Young, Brigham, 1801-1877
In 1846, polygamy condemned at the Conferences of the European Mormon
churches in England.
In 1848, "polygism" and "sexual resurrectionism" severely denounced in
the "Millennial Star," published in Liverpool.
In 1850, polygamy denounced and repudiated by Apostle John Taylor, in
France.
And yet, in the face of all these facts, in 1852, we have the same
doctrine publicly given to the church, accompanied by the announcement,
that it had been believed and practised by the church for many years.
Now, it will not be pretended by any one, that polygamy was any part of
the Mormon religion previous to 1843.
Take, then, the period from 1843 to 1852. How was it during those nine
years? Which shall be taken as evidence of what was the teaching of the
Mormon religion, on that subject, during that time? The Book of Doctrine
and Covenants, the Notices published by Joseph and Hyrum Smith, the
declarations of Pratt and Spencer, the action of the churches in
England, and the assertions of Taylor in France, or the announcement
made in Great Salt Lake City in 1852? Are we not, at least, as much
authorized to take the former as the latter?
If the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, the writings of Joseph and Hyrum,
the continued and persistent declarations of the Mormon leaders, and the
action of the Mormon churches be taken, then polygamy was no part of
Mormonism up to 1852. And if not previous to that time, it was not
afterward, for Young did not pretend to give it at that time as a new
revelation, but rested the doctrine entirely on the revelation said to
have been given to Joseph in 1843.
2. A singular feature of this revelation is, that in it God is made
expressly to contradict what he is represented as having said in the
Book of Mormon.
According to the Book of Mormon, as already quoted, God said the
polygamy and concubinage of David and Solomon were abominable before
him. The following is the language: "Behold David and Solomon truly had
many wives and concubines, which thing was abominable before me, saith
the Lord."
This was the testimony of the Almighty, as to the manner in which he
viewed the conduct of David and Solomon, up to July, 1843, when he is
represented in this revelation as indorsing those very acts which, in
the Book of Mormon, he had so strongly condemned.
3. Again: This revelation classes Isaac and Moses with Abraham, Jacob,
David, and Solomon, as polygamists; when in fact neither Isaac nor Moses
ever practised polygamy. How could the All-wise Being make such a
mistake?
4. The most remarkable circumstance connected with this revelation
remains to be considered,--It was in direct contradiction to the laws of
the land.
At that time, July 12, 1843, Smith resided at Nauvoo, Illinois, and was,
of course, together with all the other inhabitants of that city,
amenable to the laws of Illinois.
The following statute was then in force in that State, the same having
been passed February 12, 1833:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account