Does anger arise from the same provocations and run the same course
in a club, upon a college campus, among workmen in a factory, between
“society people,” between an employer and his employe, a teacher and
a pupil, close friends, business competitors? Evidently not. If my
friend craftily grabs the good things in sight and leaves me in the
lurch, I am affronted; but not if my business competitor does the same
thing. When a teacher corrects a pupil’s error, all remains serene, but
when a pupil corrects a teacher’s error we cannot be so sure of calm
weather. If one of my society acquaintances spills hot tea upon me, I
am more likely to pity him than to be angry with him; but suppose that
a waiter in a restaurant spills anything on me! What would be an insult
in a club or on the golf links is only bluff geniality among workmen,
or coltishness among college students. One of the most astonishing
instances of the control of primitive feelings by a social precedent,
preliminary practice being entirely lacking, may be seen in hazings and
initiations among collegians.
So sensitive is anger to its setting within a system of ideas.
Moreover, the particular expressions of it, when it does arise, are
almost purely conventional. Whether one shall stiffen up in haughty
silence and stare at the offender; speak a frigid word; utter a hot
epithet; swear; or deliver a fisticuff, or a challenge to a duel
depends upon already accepted notions as to what is appropriate in the
given social setting. The object towards which it is directed, also,
is often thought-selected. If I get “hot” when a dining-car waiter
serves my roast and potato cold I may “roast” either the waiter, the
cook, the steward, or the railroad company. It appears to have been
a custom of ancient potentates to punish messengers who brought bad
news, but we esteem ourselves fortunate if our newsgatherers tell the
truth whether or not it pains us. If some Chinese, out of patience at
our delay in the revocation of the unequal treaties, insult and abuse
or kill some of our nationals, our resentment will flame, according to
our thought-habits, against the Chinese who did the act, against the
Chinese people, or against our own officials who were dilatory about
removing an irritation.
How far anger shall go, once it gets started, is likewise largely
a matter of social tradition. In some circles of society, physical
chastisement for provoking conduct is entirely proper, and it is
administered then and there; in other circles, this so far offends
good form that it scarcely occurs at all. Though knocking a man down
for an insulting word may be applauded, kicking a man when he is down
is the act of a “mucker.” “Be ye angry and sin not; let not the sun go
down upon your wrath.” That is, though a sudden and temporary burst of
this passion be excusable, the nursing of wrath is not. Yet there are
populations in which the nursing of wrath until revenge can be had is
the mark of a man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account