Thus far our considerations are negative; but there are positive
ones also. For it can be shown that within these two general areas
unprecedented inclinations, or likes and dislikes, have repeatedly
arrived. Sex-inclinations are the most easily-read instance. Since
sexual reproduction was preceded by a-sexual, the sex-appetite in its
totality had a beginning; it entered into a system in which it had
been non-existent; it was an utterly new attraction. Moreover, it has
undergone modifications and reversals. In some species promiscuity
is attractive; in others sex-inclination spontaneously selects one
permanent mate--among the pigeons, for example. In the case of man, so
many differentiations, and such profound ones, have taken place that
we are put to it to make our terminology consistent. Shall we classify
the satisfaction that personal beauty in the opposite sex gives us as
sexual, esthetic, or both? Certainly there was a stage in evolution
at which appreciation of beauty had nothing whatever to do with sex.
And what shall we say of mental graces--of wit, humor, originality,
sincerity, good taste? These attract men toward women and women toward
men; somehow these primarily non-sexual mental graces become a sex
bond. It is clear, then, that this drive is no single, unchanging
thing; it is the scene and area of spontaneous, new, unprecedented
inclinations; its first, raw stages, which chiefly attract biological
interest, taken by themselves, misrepresent the truth as much as they
represent it. Would it be old-fashioned, or rather merely “getting
up to date,” to add that fellowship between two personal spirits,
recognizing and prizing and cultivating themselves as such, and
therefore placing the primary sex-relation upon a basis of mutual
respect and reverence--that such fellowship must be recognized and
appreciated if one is to understand the sex drive as a human desire and
motive?
A similar creativeness in the realm of drives has appeared somewhere
in the world in relation to every type of human desire. The interests
of men do not move in any straight line; they dart and quiver;
explore, discover, make new habitations, and then migrate from the
homes that they have builded for themselves. There was a time, for
example, when our ancestors had no taste, no drive, for artistic
creation. But at last there arose--we need not stop to say by what
stages--a satisfaction that was not entirely dependent upon utility
or consumption. Objects began to be made for the pleasure that the
mere sight of them gave. Here is the evolution of a new species of
motivation. We might almost say “species” in the biological sense,
for art-interests breed freely among themselves but tend to become
infertile when they are crossed with other interests.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account