The testing movement has had the effect of stressing “nature” rather
than “nurture” as the great determinant of conduct--over-stressing
it, indeed. But the creative type of school-experience yields data
that help towards a balanced understanding of the factors. In general,
this experience tends to make both nature and nurture stand out; the
old bipolarity of heredity-environment, nature-nurture, remains, but
both poles are illuminated. This type of school makes obvious the
differences in native gifts, but it shows likewise that conditions
created by adults have prevented us from knowing what gifts are there.
Whenever a given sort of conduct is oft-repeated, our first, incautious
impulse is to guess that the conduct in question is produced by some
specific quality or bent of one’s original nature. The absence, or even
the great infrequency of anything, is taken, similarly, as evidence
that there is a vacant place in one’s nature. Thus a bad mental habit,
a fallacious mode of judging, gets control of us. “It’s his nature,”
we say, not stopping to consider whether the whole of his capacity
or only a fraction of it has been displayed. What the experimental
schools are doing is to bring into action capacities that commonly are
under-exercised and therefore not recognized as existing.
These schools are proving that there is more in human nature than
we had dreamed of in our philosophy. The method of the proof is, in
principle, simple: Make conditions favorable for the maximum voluntary
exercise of any and all worth-while capacities that may possibly be
there. When this is done, behold, pupils “take an interest in” many
things that have been regarded as beyond their range. We are finding
out that teaching of the traditional sorts has habitually aimed under
the heads rather than over the heads of pupils. An intellectual
springiness that teachers and parents failed to discover or produce
by the methods of prescription, spontaneously appears under the new
conditions. Conduct now occurs that is better by far than old-type
schools ever thought of requiring or even recommending.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account