However, his superiors appeared to be satisfied, and, towards the
beginning of June Hanslet went off upon his long postponed leave. The
Professor’s time was fully occupied in correcting the proofs of _Some
Aspects of Modern Thought_, which were now coming in from the printer,
whose reader, appalled by some of the Professor’s strictures upon his
contemporaries, had scattered here and there across the margin the
ominous words “Query, libellous?” To each of these the Professor added
the note: “Nonsense!” in letters half an inch long at least. It was
perhaps fortunate for the conscientious reader that he was beyond the
reach of the Professor’s tongue.
The rigid police protection which had at first been imposed upon both
the Professor and Mr. Ludgrove had been gradually relaxed until now it
had dwindled to nothing more serious than a casual glance at their
houses by the constable on beat when he happened to pass them. The
professor himself appeared to have forgotten the warning given to him
by the Black Sailor, and to have acquiesced in the official view that,
since the perpetrator had committed suicide, nothing further would be
heard of the murders.
It was while matters were in this state that Dr. Priestley received
one Saturday morning a letter which obviously caused him some
satisfaction. It was signed “Elmer Ludgrove” and was written in a
curiously neat and clerkly hand. The contents of it were as follows:
“Dear Sir. I should not venture to write to you, but for the fact
that I know that you are as interested in the recent affair of the
numbered counters as I am myself. I have recently come across,
wholly by accident, certain curious facts which may serve to throw
an entirely fresh light upon the deaths of six men, which, to my
mind, have not yet been satisfactorily explained. I am not anxious
to approach the police, at least until I have consulted you. The
police, as is perhaps natural, could scarcely be expected to welcome
disclosures which would completely upset their official theory. They
believe, as I confess I did at one time myself, that the late Mr.
Copperdock was guilty, and that his mania finally culminated in his
own suicide.
“If I am correct in my deductions from the new evidence which has
come into my hands, I can prove beyond question that Mr. Copperdock
was innocent, indeed, that he himself fell a victim to the agency
which committed the other murders. I must ask you to respect my
confidence until you have allowed me to put my evidence before you.
When this has been done, I shall ask your advice as to the best
means of laying it before the authorities. You, I have reason to
believe, are on friendly terms with Inspector Hanslet, and perhaps
you will agree, when you have examined the evidence I shall put
before you, that it will be best to call him into consultation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account