The Mute Stones Speak: The Story of Archaeology in ItalyMacKendrick, Paul Lachlan
History
The Mute Stones Speak: The Story of Archaeology in Italy
MacKendrick, Paul Lachlan
Italy -- Antiquities
On the other side of the basilica, excavation of what had been called
Building C brought further surprises. When the workmen had stripped
the surface humus off the area of the forecourt, the excavators found
themselves looking at a perfect circle of dark earth enclosed by a
sandy yellow fill. Further digging established this as a circular,
theater-like structure, big enough to hold 600 people. There was an
altar in the middle. This must have been the Comitium, the colony’s
assembly-place (Fig. 4.7). Building C, behind it, must have been the
Curia, or Senate House. The undisturbed fill under the Curia floor
proved completely sterile; hence the curia must have been built at a
date near the foundation of the colony. At this stage both Curia and
Comitium were apparently of wood, replaced in a second phase, before
the end of the third century B.C., with purple tufa from nearby Vulci.
[Illustration: FIG. 4.7 Cosa, Comitium. (L. Richardson, Jr.,
_Archaeology_ 10 [1957], p. 50)]
A healthy site, an orderly plan, a water supply, strong walls, housing,
provision for political and religious needs: the basic necessities are
all here, at Cosa, and all as early as the founding of the colony.
By hard work, painstaking accuracy, and intelligent inference, Brown
and Richardson, the excavators of Cosa, have given us the clearest
possible picture of the physical structure of a Roman colony well on
in the first intense period of history in the planting of advanced
bases. Cosa is clearly the fruit of long practice and Etrusco-Italic
tradition, untouched by Hellenism (no Greek architectural language
in sculptural or ornamental marble) or by new-fangled techniques (no
brick or concrete in the early phases). When we carry down Cosa’s
architectural history to the early Empire, we infer the death of
freedom of speech from the remodelling of the basilica into a theater.
And when freedom of speech and public life died, the colony lost its
sense of community. Its thirty-three acres would have held 3000 to 3500
settlers comfortably. But the first draft of settlers numbered probably
2500 families. (We infer families, not soldiers only, from the
discovery of loomweights, hardly appropriate for Roman legionaries.)
2500 families make a population of at least 7500, and probably more,
given Italian philoprogenitiveness. Some of these must have lived well
outside the colony; only those whose centuriated allotments, explained
below, lay nearest the walls would have lived in the colony proper.
The holders of more distant plots would come to town only for market,
worship, litigation (as long as the basilica lasted), or refuge from
raiding parties of Gauls or other enemies. And so, under despotism, the
community disintegrated. The temples held on longest. “Only the gods,
in the end,” writes Professor Brown, “held steadfastly to their ancient
seats.”
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account