They seated themselves upon the sofa, and looked at each other for an instant without speaking. Those glances on either side expressed, in the ardent language of the eye, the words--"This is the day!" "Walter," said Mr. Stephens, at length breaking the silence which had prevailed, "your conduct to-day must crown my designs with glorious success, or involve me in irretrievable ruin." "You may rely with confidence upon my discretion and prudence," answered Walter. "Command me in all respects--consistently with honour." "Honour!" exclaimed Stephens impatiently: "why do you for ever mention that unmeaning word? _Honour_ is a conventional term, and is often used in a manner inconsistently with common sense and sound judgment. _Honour_ is all very well when it is brought in contact with _honour_ only; but when it has to oppose fraud and deceit, it must succumb if it trust solely to its own force. The most honest lawyer sets chichanery and quibble to work, to counteract the chichanery and quibble of his pettifogging opponent: the politician calls the machinery of intrigue into play, in order to fight his foeman with that foeman's own weapons:--if the French employ the aid of riflemen concealed in the thicket while the fair fight takes place upon the plain, the English must do the same." "I certainly comprehend the necessity of frequently fighting a man with his own weapons," said Walter; "but I do not see to what point in our affairs your reasoning tends." "Suppose, Walter," resumed Stephens, speaking very earnestly, and emphatically accentuating every syllable,--"suppose that you had a friend who was entitled to certain rights which were withheld from him by means of some detestable quibble and low chicanery; suppose that by stating that your friend's name was George instead of William, for instance, you could put him in possession of what is justly and legitimately his due, but which, remember, is shamefully and most dishonestly kept away from him;--in this case, should you hesitate to declare that his name was George, and not William?" "I think that I should be inclined to make the statement, to serve the cause of justice and to render a friend a signal service," answered Sydney, after a moment's hesitation. "I could not have expected a different reply," exclaimed Stephens, a gleam of joy animating his pale countenance: "and you would do so with less remorse when you found that you were transferring property from one individual who could well spare what he was never justly entitled to, to a person who would starve without the restoration of his legitimate rights." "Oh! certainly," said Walter; and this time the reply was given without an instant's meditation.