The Mysteries of London, v. 4/4Reynolds, George W. M. (George William MacArthur)
General
The Mysteries of London, v. 4/4
Reynolds, George W. M. (George William MacArthur)
London (England) -- Fiction; Penny dreadfuls
Thus, Charles Hatfield suddenly adopted the belief that Tamar was not
Rainford’s wife. Neither, indeed, was she at the time when Rainford
was arrested by Mr. Dykes; and it never struck the young man that the
matrimonial ceremony might have been performed between the period of
Rainford’s resuscitation and the murder of the Jewish lady. For when
the nuptial blessing _was_ performed in Paris, Charles--being then
a mere boy--was not present at the proceedings which took place as
privately as possible in the British Ambassador’s Chapel. As for his
suspicion that the Countess of Ellingham was ashamed to breathe the
name of Tamar,--Oh! the reader may judge how erroneous was that belief!
In her heart of hearts did the generous Esther treasure the image of
that dearly-beloved sister;--and if neither herself nor her noble
husband ever breathed her name, it was through kind feelings towards
Mr. Hatfield and motives of delicacy in respect to Georgiana. But
Charles, being as yet ignorant that his father and Rainford were one
and the same person, could not possibly suspect the necessity for the
exercise of such kind feelings on the one hand or such delicacy on the
other.
“And thus,” murmured Charles to himself, as he closed the book which
had made such marvellous and horrifying revelations,--“and thus Thomas
Rainford was a highwayman! The good--kind-hearted--generous man who
loved me, was a felon--a criminal: he passed through the hands of the
public executioner! Oh! my God--what dreadful things have I this night
learnt!” he exclaimed aloud, pressing his hand to his forehead. “But
how came this Thomas Rainford to have the care of me?--how was it that
my parents could have left me so long in his hands--or at his disposal?
Oh! no wonder--no wonder that Mr. de Medina and Esther should have
charged me, when first they left me at school, never to mention the
name of Rainford! And now how many gaps in the earliest portion of my
reminiscences are filled up,--that absence of Mr. Rainford for several
weeks, during which period I pined after him--that constant weeping
of Tamar--then the removal to Mr. de Medina’s house, and the sudden
revival of joy which Tamar experienced there. But--a highwayman--a
felon--a criminal! Oh! what awful mysteries envelop all this matter
still! For the Earl of Ellingham was intimate with Rainford--and it
was said, I remember, that at Mr. de Medina’s death he left to this
same Rainford a large fortune. A fortune to whom?--to the seducer of
his daughter--to one who had passed through the hands of the public
executioner! And Lord Ellingham was intimate with the man who seduced
the sister of his intended wife;--and Esther was friendly likewise
with him who ruined that sister. Gracious God! all this is most
unaccountable--so unaccountable, that I am lost and bewildered! But
most mysterious--ten thousand times the most mysterious of all these
incidents, is that one grand fact to which I cannot but recur,--how
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account