The mystery of Easter island: the story of an expeditionRoutledge, Katherine
History
The mystery of Easter island: the story of an expedition
Routledge, Katherine
Easter Island; Oceania -- Description and travel; Voyages and travels
The questions which arise are obvious: do these buried statues differ in
any way from those in the workings above, from those on the ahu or from
one another? were they put up on any foundation? and, above all, what is
the history of the mountain and the _raison d’être_ of the figures? In
the hope of throwing some light on these problems we started to dig them
out. It had originally been thought that the excavation of one or two
would give all the information which it was possible to obtain, but each
case was found to have unique and instructive features, and we finally
unearthed in this way, wholly or in part, some twenty or thirty statues.
It was usually easy to trace the stages by which the figures had been
gradually covered. On the top was a layer of surface soil, from 3 to 8
inches in depth; then came debris, which had descended from the quarry
above in the form of rubble, it contained large numbers of chisels, some
forty of which have been found in digging out one statue; below this was
the substance in which a hole had been dug to erect the image, it
sometimes consisted of clay and occasionally in part of rock. Not
unfrequently the successive descents of earth could be traced by the
thin lines of charcoal which marked the old surfaces, obviously the
result of grass or brushwood fires. The few statues which are in a
horizontal position are always on the surface (no. 31, fig. 60), and at
first give the impression that they have been abandoned in the course of
being brought down from the quarries; as they are frequently found close
to standing images, of which only the head is visible, it follows that,
if this is the correct solution, the work must still have been
proceeding when the earlier statues were already largely submerged. The
juxtaposition, however, occurs so often that it seems, on the whole,
more probable that the rush of earth which covered some, upset the
foundations of others, and either threw them down where they stood or
carried them with it on top of the flood. These various landslips allow
of no approximate deductions as to the date, in the manner which is
possible with successively deposited layers of earth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account