The mystery of space : $b a study of the hyperspace movement in the light of the evolution of new psychic faculties and an inquiry into the genesis and essential nature of spaceBrowne, Robert T.
Religion
The mystery of space : $b a study of the hyperspace movement in the light of the evolution of new psychic faculties and an inquiry into the genesis and essential nature of space
Browne, Robert T.
Hyperspace
"If we seek the most satisfactory understanding of space we shall
look neither to mathematics nor Psychology but to Physics. The
trend of Physics, say with such a representative as OSTWALD, is
to make things the expression of force; the constitution and
appearance of things are determined by dynamism; and we may best
interpret space as a mode of this dynamic appearance."
Space, as a mode of dynamic appearance is a slight improvement upon the
old idea of a pure vacuity; for in the light of what we now know about
space content much of the dignity of that view has been lost. Men now
know that space is not an empty void. They know that the atmosphere
fills a great deal of space. They also have extended their conception
in this direction to include the ether and occultism goes further
and postulates four kinds of ether--the chemical, life, light and
psychographic ethers. But it does not stop here. It postulates a series
of grades of finer matter than the physical which fills space and
permeates its entire extent even to identification with its essential
nature.
[13] _Philosophical Review_, Vol. VII (1898).
STANLEY continues:
"Everything does not, as commonly conceived, fall into some
pre-existent space convenient for it; but everything makes its
own spaciousness by its own defensive and offensive force, and the
totality of all appearance is space in general."
According to STANLEY, not only do physical, perceptual objects, by
their "offensive and defensive force" make their own space but the
appearance of that in which no physical object is makes room for itself
by its own dynamic force. In other words, that which we call "pure
extensity" is by virtue of its dynamism the cause of its own existence.
At first hand there appears to be little worthy of serious
consideration in this view of STANLEY; yet, if carried to its logical
conclusion, the merit of the hypothesis becomes apparent. Accordingly,
interstellar distances which are commonly said to be even without air
or life of any kind are really an appearance possessed of a dynamism
peculiar to itself. And this very force-appearance, constituting
space, is that which makes it perceivable. For instance, let us say
the space that exists between the earth and the moon, is not really
empty nor does it have an existence prior to itself, but is a mode of
dynamic appearance which is the cause of its own existence. Its dynamic
character makes it to appear perceptible to our senses. Logically, if
the dynamism were removed there would remain neither space nor the
appearance of space. If this were true, and it is worthy of serious
thought, then space is certainly finite, as in its totality, according
to STANLEY'S view, it would have to be regarded as a "phenomenon of the
inner and finite life of the infinite."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account