The mystery of space : $b a study of the hyperspace movement in the light of the evolution of new psychic faculties and an inquiry into the genesis and essential nature of spaceBrowne, Robert T.
Religion
The mystery of space : $b a study of the hyperspace movement in the light of the evolution of new psychic faculties and an inquiry into the genesis and essential nature of space
Browne, Robert T.
Hyperspace
"We must now bear in mind that this representation of a fourth
dimension suffers from all the faults of the analogous figure
of a cube in two dimensional space. The several figures are not
eight independent bodies but are mere boundaries and the four
dimensional space is conditioned by their interrelation. It is
that unrepresentable something which they inclose, or in other
words, of which they are assumed to be boundaries. If we were
four dimensional beings we could naturally and easily enter into
the mirrored space and transfer tridimensional bodies or parts
of them into those other objects reflected here in the mirrors
representing the boundaries of the four dimensional object. While
thus on the one hand the mirrored pictures would be as real as the
original object, they would not take up the space of our three
dimensions, and in this respect, our method of representing the
fourth dimension by mirrors would be quite analogous to the cube
pictured on a plane surface, for the space to which we (being
limited to our tridimensional space-conception), would naturally
relegate the seven additional mirrored images is unoccupied and if
we should make the trial, we would find it empty."
[17] Vide _Foundations of Mathematics_, pp. 93-94.
The utility of such a representation as that which CARUS outlines in
the above is granted, i.e., so far as the purpose which it serves in
giving a general idea of what a four-space object might be imagined
to be like, but the illustration does not demonstrate the existence
of a fourth dimension. It only shows what might be if there were a
four-space in which objects could exist and be examined. We, of course,
have no right to assume that because it can be shown by analogous
reasoning that certain characteristics of the fourth dimensional object
can be represented in three-space the possible existence of such an
object is thereby established. Not at all. For there is no imaginable
condition of tridimensional mechanics in which an object may be said to
have an objective existence similar to that represented by the mirrored
cube.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account