Bathurst, Anthony (Fictitious character) -- Fiction; Detective and mystery stories; England -- Fiction
“Exactly—a blue-tinted emerald, I believe—stated to be unique as far
as _individual_ possession goes. If there are others floating around
nobody has seen them. Now we come to a most extraordinary chain of
events. Extraordinary and yet ultimately with quite a simple
explanation. According to my investigations the stolen notes—or some
of them—were first traced to a Captain Willoughby—a guest at the
‘Cassandra’ Hotel, Seabourne. This Captain Willoughby, I may say, has
a connection—through his fiancée—with no less a person than Miss
Daphne Carruthers. Mark that! When I got here I felt I was nearly
home. Not so likely! Willoughby got the notes from a Hebrew bookmaker!
Who is a patient of Branston, the very dentist concerned with the
murder! Still on the track, say I. Morley, the bookmaker—the dentist’s
patient—got them from Branston himself! There I am again—just like
‘Felix.’ Would you believe it? Branston turns up—he got them from his
housekeeper, who released him—so they say, the pair of them—from his
surprising imprisonment when Miss Delaney was being murdered! And the
housekeeper found the notes on Branston’s premises after the murder!
Or says she did. Some little kettle of fish, don’t you think, sir?
Some little mayonnaise—eh?” He wiped his lips with his handkerchief.
It was easy to see that Bannister was amazed. “Let the ‘Bugle’ have a
blow at that. Nevertheless, I’ve got a stray theory—I’m very hopeful,
as I told you earlier. I’ve almost decided to arrest Branston and the
housekeeper—Mrs. Bertenshaw—I can make out a strong ‘prima-facie’ case
against them.” He paused—waiting for his Chief’s comment upon this
last statement.
Sir Austin drummed upon the table with the finger-tips of his left
hand—apparently uncertain. “Can’t see it myself,” he interjected. “Not
on what you have given me so far. What about this ‘Peacock’s Eye?’
Where’s that?”
Bannister shrugged his shoulders rather impatiently. “I can’t trace
any attempt to dispose of that—so far. All the notorious ‘fences’ have
been and are still being—very carefully watched—by some of our best
men. In my opinion not more than four of the known ‘fences’ would look
at the proposition.”
“And they are?” put in Sir Austin.
Bannister thought for a moment. “Levigne and Kharkoff in
Paris—Stefanopoulos in Amsterdam—and Schneitzer here in London.
Personally—of course, I may be wrong, I know—but I wouldn’t consider
anybody else.”
To Anthony, of course, the four names were entirely unfamiliar. He
docketed them in the pigeon-hole of his memory and was just in the
midst of the requisite mental process when Sir Austin Kemble turned to
him and addressed him. He noticed that the Commissioner was smiling
again. “And you, Mr. Bathurst—what have you got to tell me? Is your
story on all fours with Bannister’s? Are you in agreement with him? Or
have you formed a different opinion?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account