Detective and mystery stories; Reporters and reporting -- Fiction; Rouletabille, Joseph (Fictitious character) -- Fiction
“But the third evidence puzzled me altogether. Having placed Larsan at
the end of the ‘off-turning gallery,’ I could not explain how he had
taken advantage of the moment when I had gone to the left wing of the
château to find Monsieur Stangerson and Daddy Jacques, to return to
Mademoiselle Stangerson’s room. It was a very dangerous thing to do. He
risked being captured,—and he knew it. And he was very nearly captured.
He had not had time to regain his post, as he had certainly hoped to
do. He had then a very strong reason for returning to his room. As for
myself, when I sent Daddy Jacques to the end of the ‘right gallery,’
I naturally thought that Larsan was still at his post. Daddy Jacques,
in going to his post, had not looked, when he passed, to see whether
Larsan was at _his_ post or not.
“What, then, was the urgent reason which had compelled Larsan to go
to the room a second time? I guessed it to be some evidence of his
presence there. He had left something very important in that room.
What was it? And had he recovered it? I begged Madame Bernier who
was accustomed to clean the room to look, and she found a pair of
eye-glasses—this pair, Monsieur President!”
And Rouletabille drew the eye-glasses, of which we know, from his
pocket.
“When I saw these eye-glasses,” he continued, “I was utterly
nonplussed. I had never seen Larsan wear eye-glasses. What did they
mean? Suddenly I exclaimed to myself: ‘I wonder if he is long-sighted?’
I had never seen Larsan write. He might, then, be _long-sighted_. They
would certainly know at the Sûreté, and also know if the glasses were
his. Such evidence would be damning. That explained Larsan’s return.
I know now that Larsan, or Ballmeyer, is long-sighted and that these
glasses belonged to him.
“I now made one mistake. I was not satisfied with the evidence I had
obtained. I wished to see the man’s face. Had I refrained from this,
the second terrible attack would not have occurred.”
“But,” asked the President, “why should Larsan go to Mademoiselle
Stangerson’s room, at all? Why should he twice attempt to murder her?”
“Because he loves her, Monsieur President.”
“That is certainly a reason, but—”
“It is the only reason. He was madly in love, and because of that,
and—other things, he was capable of committing any crime.”
“Did Mademoiselle Stangerson know this?”
“Yes, Monsieur; but she was ignorant of the fact that the man who was
pursuing her was Frédéric Larsan, otherwise, of course, he would not
have been allowed to be at the château. I noticed, when he was in her
room after the incident in the gallery, that he kept himself in the
shadow, and that he kept his head bent down. He was looking for the
lost eye-glasses. Mademoiselle Stangerson knew Larsan under another
name.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account