The Mystic Will: A Method of Developing and Strengthening the Faculties of the Mind, through the Awakened Will, by a Simple, Scientific Process Possible to Any Person of Ordinary IntelligenceLeland, Charles Godfrey
Philosophy
The Mystic Will: A Method of Developing and Strengthening the Faculties of the Mind, through the Awakened Will, by a Simple, Scientific Process Possible to Any Person of Ordinary Intelligence
Leland, Charles Godfrey
Mental suggestion
"Therefore learn, that by Foresight man can know future things; and,
from experience, the past and present. Thereby is man so highly gifted
in Nature that he knows or perceives (_sicht_), as he goes, his
neighbor or friend in a distant land. Yet, on waking, he knows nothing
of all this. For God has given to us all--Art, Wisdom, Reason--to know
the future, and what passes in distant lands; but we know it not, for
we fools, busied in common things, sleep away, as it were, what is in
us. Thus, seeing one who is a better artist than thou art, do not say
that he has more gift or grace than thou; for thou hast it also, but
hast not tried, and so is it with all things. What Adam and Moses did
was to _try_, and they succeeded, and it came neither from the Devil
nor from Spirits, but from the Light of Nature, which they developed
in themselves. But we do _not_ seek for what is in us, therefore we
remain nothing, and are nothing."
Here the author very obscurely, yet vigorously, declares that we can
do or learn what we _will_, but it must be achieved by foresight,
will, and the aid of sleep.
It seems very evident, after careful study of the text, that here, as
in many other places, our author indicates familiarity with the method
of developing mental action in its subtlest and most powerful forms.
Firstly, by determined Foresight, and, secondly, by the aid of sleep,
corresponding to the bringing a seed to rest a while, and thereby
cause it to germinate; the which admirable simile he himself uses in a
passage which I have not cited.
PARACELSUS was the most original thinker and the worst writer of a
wondrous age, when all wrote badly and thought badly. There is in
his German writings hardly one sentence which is not ungrammatical,
confused, or clumsy; nor one without a vigorous idea, which shows the
mind or character of the man.
As a curious instance of the poetic originality of PARACELSUS we may
take the following:
"It is an error to suppose that chiromancy is limited to the hand, for
there are significant lines (indicating character), all over the body.
And it is so in vegetable life. For in a plant every leaf is a hand.
Man hath two; a tree many, and every one reveals its anatomy--a
hand-anatomy. Now ye shall understand that in double form the lines
are masculine or feminine. And there are as many differences in these
lines on leaves as in human hands."
GOETHE has the credit that he reformed or advanced the Science of
Botany, by reducing the plant to the leaf as the germ or type; and
this is now further reduced to the cell, but the step was a great one.
Did not PARACELSUS, however, give the idea?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account