The National Magazine, Vol. XV, No. 1, November 1891Various
History
The National Magazine, Vol. XV, No. 1, November 1891
Various
Local history -- Periodicals; United States -- History -- Periodicals; West (U.S.) -- History -- Periodicals
It was a matter within the discretion of the Magistrate to some extent.
This office was held by William Pynehon, of Springfield, Mass., for the
first eleven years, afterwards for half a century by John Pynehon and
his associates. In awarding this punishment of whipping little regard
seems to have been paid by the court to the sex or social position of
the offender. If the infliction of the penalty tended to disgrace the
culprit, the commission of the offence was in itself disgraceful. The
degrading punishment was regarded the just and proper sequence of the
disgraceful crime.
The constable was the officer by whom the sentence was executed, and the
public whipping post was the place. The time was sometimes the day on
which the court was held. Occasionally, the day of the weekly religious
lecture was designated as the time for the infliction.
Sometimes whipping was an alternative sentence to be inflicted if the
offender failed to pay his fine. Often it was the only punishment awarded.
Some instances will be given, taken from the records—most of them are
from the Pynehon record, containing cases tried by William Pynehon as a
Magistrate, and cases tried by his son, John Pynehon, in connection with
Eleziar Holyoke and Dr. Samuel Chapin who were commissioners appointed by
the General Court.
FALSE REPORTS, SLANDERS, ETC.
In May, 1645, the General Court enacted a law designed to suppress the
invention and circulation of false reports, whether injurious to private
individuals or to the public in general.
The preamble was in these words:
“WHEREAS, Truth in words, as well as actions, is required of all men,
especially of Christians who are the professed servants of the God of
truth; and
“WHEREAS, All lying is contrary to truth, and some sort of lies are
not only sinful (as all lies are), but also pernicious to the public
weal and injurious to particular persons. It is therefore ordered that
every person who shall wittingly and willingly make or publish any lie
pernicious to the public weal or tending to the damage or injury of any
particular person, or with intent to deceive and abuse the people with
false news and reports shall be punished.
For the 1st offence a fine of 10 shillings, &c.
For the 2d offence a fine of 20 shillings or be whipped upon the naked
body not exceeding 10 stripes.
For the 3rd offence a fine of 4 shillings or 15 stripes, &c., &c.”
The following is a case for slander in imputing to a woman the offence
witchcraft.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account