The Natural History of Pliny, Volume 5 (of 6)Pliny, the Elder
History
The Natural History of Pliny, Volume 5 (of 6)
Pliny, the Elder
Natural history -- Pre-Linnean works
MEDICAL AUTHORS QUOTED.—Mnesitheus,[2047] Timaristus,[2048]
Simus,[2049] Hippocrates,[2050] Chrysippus,[2051] Diocles,[2052]
Ophelion,[2053] Heraclides,[2054] Hicesius,[2055] Dionysius,[2056]
Apollodorus[2057] of Citium, Apollodorus[2058] of Tarentum,
Praxagoras,[2059] Plistonicus,[2060] Medius,[2061] Dieuches,[2062]
Cleophantus,[2063] Philistion,[2064] Asclepiades,[2065] Crateuas,[2066]
Petronius Diodotus,[2067] Iollas,[2068] Erasistratus,[2069]
Diagoras,[2070] Andreas,[2071] Mnesides,[2072] Epicharmus,[2073]
Damion,[2074] Tlepolemus,[2075] Metrodorus,[2076] Solo,[2077]
Lycus,[2078] Olympias[2079] of Thebes, Philinus,[2080] Petrichus,[2081]
Micton,[2082] Glaucias,[2083] Xenocrates.[2084]
⁂ Before quitting the Botanical Books of Pliny, it is a duty both to
our author and to the reader, to call attention to the illustrations
of a few passages in this work, which will be found in the _Textrinum
Antiquorum_, by Dr. James Yates, F.R.S., a book characterized by
learning, equally profound and extensive, and the most indefatigable
research: it being but recently, we are sorry to say, that we have been
made acquainted with its valuable contents.
The following are selected as among the most useful and interesting
results of his enquiries.
B. vi. c. 20 [V. ii. p. 36]. Dr. Yates is of opinion that Pliny has
here mistranslated a passage of Aristotle, Hist. Anim. v. 19 and that
he has mistaken the word βομβύκια, “cocoons,” for webs, similar to
those of the spider, attached to the leaves of trees. Not understanding
the original, he would seem to have given a distorted account of the
simple operation of winding the threads from off the cocoons of the
silkworm upon bobbins, by the hands of females; the threads upon which
bobbins would be afterwards unwound for the manufacture of silken
fabrics. See Notes 303 and 304 on the passage in question; also B. xi.
c. 26.
B. viii. c. 74 [V. ii. p. 336]. For the word “Sororiculata,” Dr. Yates
proposes to read “Soriculata,” and he suggests that the cloth thus
called may have been a velvet or plush, which received its name from
its resemblance to the coat of the field-mouse, “sorex,” the diminutive
of which would be “soricula.”
B. xix. c. 2 [V. iv. p. 133] and c. 6 [p. 138], Dr. Yates expresses
it as his opinion that the words “Carbasus” and “Carbasa” are derived
from the oriental word _Carpos_, signifying “cotton,” and thinks that
Pliny, in B. xix. c. 2, may have used the word by Catachresis, as
meaning linen, in the same manner as the Latin poets repeatedly use the
word “carbasa,” as signifying various kinds of woven textures. If this
view be correct, the word “Carbasina” in B. xix. c. 6, will probably
mean “awnings of woven material” generally, and not of fine linen, or
cambric, as suggested in Note 856.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account