The Natural History of Pliny, Volume 6 (of 6)Pliny, the Elder
History
The Natural History of Pliny, Volume 6 (of 6)
Pliny, the Elder
Natural history -- Pre-Linnean works
Equestrian statues are also held in esteem in Rome; but they are of
Greek origin, no doubt. Among the Greeks, those persons only were
honoured with equestrian statues who were victors on horseback[1270] in
the sacred games; though afterwards the same distinction was bestowed
on those who were successful in the races with chariots with two or
four horses: hence the use of chariots with us in the statues of those
who have triumphed. But this did not take place until a late period;
and it was not until the time of the late Emperor Augustus, that we had
chariots represented with six horses,[1271] as also with elephants.
CHAP. 11.—IN HONOUR OF WHOM PUBLIC STATUES WERE FIRST ERECTED: IN
HONOUR OF WHOM THEY WERE FIRST PLACED ON PILLARS: WHEN THE ROSTRA WERE
FIRST ERECTED.
The custom of erecting chariots with two horses in honour of those who
had discharged the office of prætor, and had passed round the Circus in
a chariot, is not of ancient date. That of placing statues on pillars
is older, as it was done in honour of C. Mænius,[1272] who conquered
the ancient Latins, to whom the Romans by treaty gave one third of the
spoil which they had obtained. It was in the same consulship also,
that the “rostra” or beaks of the ships, which had been taken from
the Antiates when vanquished, were fixed to the tribunal; it being
the year of the City, 416.[1273] The same thing was done also by
Caius Duillius, who was the first to obtain a naval triumph over the
Carthaginians: his column still remains in the Forum.[1274] I am not
certain whether this honour was not first conferred by the people on L.
Minutius, the præfect of the markets; whose statue was erected without
the Trigeminian Gate,[1275] by means of a tax of the twelfth of an
as[1276] per head: the same thing, however, had been previously done
by the senate, and it would have been a more distinguished honour had
it not had its origin on such frivolous occasions. The statue of Attus
Navius,[1277] for example, was erected before the senate-house, the
pedestal of which was consumed when the senate-house itself was burnt
at the funeral of Publius Clodius.[1278] The statue of Hermodorus also,
the Ephesian,[1279] the interpreter of the laws which were transcribed
by the Decemvirs, was erected by the public in the Comitium.[1280]
It was for a very different, and more important reason, that the statue
of Horatius Cocles was erected, he having singly prevented the enemy
from passing the Sublician bridge:[1281] a statue which remains to this
day. I am not at all surprized, too, that statues of the Sibyl should
have been erected near the Rostra, even though three in number; one of
which was repaired by Sextus Pacuvius Taurus, ædile of the people, and
the other two by M. Messala. I should have considered these and that of
Attus Navius to have been the oldest, as having been placed there in
the time of Tarquinius Priscus, had there not been in the Capitol the
statues of the preceding kings.[1282]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account