Natural history -- England -- Wiltshire; Wiltshire (England) -- History
THE celebrated antiquity of Stonehenge, as also that stupendious but
unheeded antiquity at Aubury, &c. I affirme to have been temples, and
built by the Britons. See my Templa Druidum. [The essay referred to was
a part of Aubrey’s Monumenta Britannica, the manuscript of which has
strangely disappeared within the last twenty yeares. I have given an
account of its contents in the Memoir of Aubrey, already frequently
referred to,(page 87). Aubrey was the first who asserted that Avebury
and Stonehenge were temples of the Britons. He was also the first
person who wrote any thing about the forms, styles, and varieties of
windows, arches, &c. in Church Architecture, and his remarks and
opinions on both subjects were judicious, curious, and original.—J. B.]
Here being so much good stone in this countrey, no doubt but that the
Romans had here, as well as in other parts, good buildings. But time
hath left us no vestigia of their architecture unlesse that little that
remains of the castle of Old Sarum, where the mortar is as hard as a
stone. This must have been a most august structure, for it is situated
upon a hill. When the high walles were standing, flanked at due
distances with towers, about seven in all, and the vast keep (arx) in
the middle crowned with another high fortification, it must needs
afford a most noble view over the plaines.
(The following account I had from the right reverend, learned, and
industrious Seth Ward, Lord Bishop of Sarum, who had taken the paines
to peruse all the old records of the church, that had been clung
together and untoucht for perhaps two hundred yeares.) Within this
castle of Old Sarum, on the east side, stood the Cathedrall church; the
tuft and scite is yet discernable: which being seated so high was so
obnoxious to the weather, that when the wind did blow they could not
heare the priest say masse. But this was not the only inconvenience.
The soldiers of the castle and the priests could never agree; and one
day, when they were gone without the castle in procession, the soldiers
kept them out all night, or longer. Whereupon the Bishop, being much
troubled, cheered them up as well as he could, and told them he would
study to accommodate them better. In order thereunto he rode severall
times to the Lady Abbesse at Wilton to have bought or exchanged a piece
of ground of her ladyship to build a church and houses for the priests.
A poor woman at Quidhampton, that was spinning in the street, sayd to
one of her neighbours, “I marvell what the matter is that the bishop
makes so many visits to my lady; I trow he intends to marry her.” Well,
the bishop and her ladyship did not conclude about the land, and the
bishop dreamt that the Virgin Mary came to him, and brought him to or
told him of Merrifield; she would have him build his church there and
dedicate it to her. Merrifield was a great field or meadow where the
city of New Sarum stands, and did belong to the Bishop, as now the
whole city belongs to him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account