The Nature of Animal LightHarvey, E. Newton (Edmund Newton)
Science
The Nature of Animal Light
Harvey, E. Newton (Edmund Newton)
Phosphorescence
Although the "gas sylvestre" (CO_{2}) of burning charcoal and
fermentation of wine was known to van Helmont (1577-1644) and Mayow
(1646-1679) in 1674 showed that "spiritus nitroærens" (oxygen) was
responsible for the life of animals and for combustion, a century
elapsed before the true significance of these gases became known. In the
meantime the phlogiston theory of combustion had been developed, Black
(1728-1799) in 1755 had rediscovered carbon dioxide ("fixed air") in the
expired air and Priestley (1733-1804) and Scheele (1742-1786) had both
rediscovered oxygen ("dephlogisticated air") in 1774. About the same
time Lavoisier overthrew the phlogiston doctrine and showed that in the
combustion of organic substances water and CO_{2} are formed.
Later it was realized that this slow combustion did not take place in
the lungs, or in the blood, but in the tissues cells themselves and
respiration in the chemical sense has come to mean this universal slow
combustion in the cells of the body rather than the breathing movements
of the lungs themselves. In anaerobic respiration, CO_{2} is given off,
but no oxygen absorbed. In aerobic respiration, oxygen is absorbed and
CO_{2} given off. In addition we know of many substances which oxidize
by taking up oxygen without giving off CO_{2}. We have seen that oxygen
must be absorbed for luminescence of animals and we may now inquire
whether CO_{2} is given off and the relation between respiration and
light production.
To determine if CO_{2} is given off during luminescence it is necessary
to work with fairly pure luminous materials, obtained from luminous
organisms. It is impossible to use the living organisms themselves as
the CO_{2} continually respired becomes a very disturbing factor. From
_Cypridina_, a small crustacean, two materials soluble in water may be
prepared (_luciferin_ and _luciferase_), which will give a brilliant
luminescence on mixing. It is possible to determine the H-ion
concentration of the two solutions separately and of the mixture of the
two after the luminescence has occurred.
If CO_{2} is produced during luminescence the H-ion concentration of the
luminous solution should increase. Measurements made electrometrically
with the hydrogen electrode have failed to demonstrate any increase in
acidity. The PH of both solutions and of a mixture of the two is 9.04.
This would indicate that CO_{2} is not produced. As both luminous
solutions contain proteins and the luminous substances themselves are
probably proteins, which have a high buffer value, a method of this kind
is none too sensitive. However, we can definitely state that not enough
CO_{2} is produced to be detected and that this may be due to the buffer
action of the luminous substances themselves. After all, unless
luminescence is connected with respiration, we should hardly expect
CO_{2} to be produced.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account