The Nature of Animal LightHarvey, E. Newton (Edmund Newton)
Science
The Nature of Animal Light
Harvey, E. Newton (Edmund Newton)
Phosphorescence
When tests are applied and precipitating reagents are added to crude
luciferin and crude oxyluciferin solution, they give identical results
in each case. A more complete account of the chemistry of luciferin has
been given in this chapter, and there is no need of duplicating these
statements regarding oxyluciferin. Like luciferin, the oxyluciferin will
pass porcelain filters, dialyze through parchment or collodion
membranes, and is undigested by salivary diastase, pepsin HCl, Merck's
pancreatin in neutral solution, and erepsin. The salivary diastase and
the pancreatin (containing amylopsin, trypsin, and lipase) were allowed
to digest for four days at 38° C. without showing any evidence of
digestive action.
As luciferin is so easily oxidizable a substance, we should expect to
find that it will reduce just as glucose will reduce. However, a
concentrated solution of luciferin has no reducing action on Fehling's
(alkaline Cu), Barfoed's (acid Cu), Nylander's (alkaline Bi) or Knapp's
(alkaline Hg) reagent. Glucose will reduce methylene blue in alkaline
(not in neutral solution), but luciferin will not reduce methylene blue
in alkaline or neutral solution. It would seem, then, that luciferin
must contain no aldehyde group. If so, we should expect to obtain
reduction of some of the above reagents. Just what group is concerned in
the oxidation is unknown at the present time, and in the absence of more
experimental data, speculation regarding it can be of little value.
SUMMARY
In summing up we may say that the luminescence of at least three groups
of luminous animals, the beetles, _Pholas_, and _Cypridina_, has been
definitely shown to be due to the interaction of two substances,
luciferin and luciferase, in presence of water and oxygen. Luciferin and
luciferase have quite different properties and may be easily separated
from each other by various chemical procedures. As the luciferins and
luciferases from different luminous animals have somewhat different
properties, they may be designated by prefixing the generic name of the
animal from which they are obtained.
_Cypridina_ luciferin differs from _Pholas_ luciferin in that it can not
be oxidized with light production by KMnO_{4}, H_{2}O_{2}, with or
without hæmoglobin, or similar oxidizing agents. _Cypridina_ luciferase
differs from _Pholas_ and firefly luciferase in that it is not readily
destroyed by the fat-solvent anæsthetics, such as chloroform, ether,
etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account