The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophyMetchnikoff, Elie
Philosophy
The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophy
Metchnikoff, Elie
Human beings; Human biology; Life (Biology)
Against this idea that the happiness of the race will be the eventual
result of progress, Hartmann employs the following arguments: “The
happiest people are those who are the rudest and most primitive, and,
among civilised races, the uneducated classes. It is well known that the
progress of education increases discontent. The progress of science
contributes little or nothing to the absolute happiness of the world.
Practically speaking, this progress is of advantage to politics, social
life, morality, and the arts; but factories, steam-boats, railways, and
telegraphs, have so far done no positive good to humanity.”[235]
Hartmann frequently recurs to the conclusion that the primitive are
happier than the civilised, and that “the lower classes, inferior and
rude, are happier than the rich who are well educated and great; that
idiots are happier than the intelligent, and that, as a general rule,
the less sensitive a man’s nervous system may be, the happier he is, as
his capacity for feeling pain is not so much in excess of his capacity
for enjoyment, and his illusion is therefore greater. With the
progressive development of humanity, however, not only is there an
increase in the extent of human needs, but in the sensitiveness of the
nervous system, and in the cultivation of the mind. In consequence, the
balance of pain over pleasure increases, and the illusion is destroyed,
that is to say, knowledge comes of the misery of life, of the vanity of
most of the pleasures. Misery itself increases as much as knowledge of
misery, as experience has shown; and the apparent increase of happiness
in the world, due to the progress of universe, is merely superficial.
Having reached this extremely pessimistic conclusion, that it is
impossible for humanity to attain happiness, Hartmann proceeds to
inquire into the real destiny of man. He would be no true philosopher if
he did not hold that the world was created according to a general plan,
and that it follows a regular course tending towards a definite end. “We
have seen,” he says, “how that in the present world all has been
arranged in the wisest, and for the most part the best way, and that it
should therefore be regarded as the best possible of worlds.
Notwithstanding this, however, it is supremely miserable, and worse than
if it did not exist at all.”
Being convinced of the illusory nature of its hopes, humanity “must
definitely renounce all pretensions to positive happiness, and aspire
only to a freedom from pain, to annihilation or Nirvâna. This, however,
must not be merely the attitude of solitary individuals, but humanity at
large must cry out for annihilation. This is the only possible outcome
of the third and last phase of illusion.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account