The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophyMetchnikoff, Elie
Philosophy
The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophy
Metchnikoff, Elie
Human beings; Human biology; Life (Biology)
The first steps taken by science according to this method, which indeed
had been suggested long ago, but which was first clearly laid down by
Bacon, were slow and halting. Religious and philosophical doctrines
still weighed heavily on inquiring minds, so that the new method was not
followed with any great courage. None the less progress was achieved,
until at length the great problems of humanity opened out. More than two
thousand years before the birth of exact science, Buddha had given voice
to the chief grievances of the human race. “Behold, O monks, the holy
truth as to suffering,” he had proclaimed in the Sermon at Benares,
“birth is suffering, old age is suffering, disease is suffering, and
death is suffering.” Science, in its slow progress, passing from
particular to general, reached first one of these four sorrows, the
suffering due to disease.
In the Buddhist legend that I quoted in chap. vi., the sight of a sick
man “whose senses were weakened, who drew his breath with difficulty,
whose limbs were shrivelled, whose bowels were wrung with pain, and his
body pitifully soiled with excrement,” suggested to Buddha the
reflection that “health is no more than the idle vision of a dream while
fear and disease are horrible realities. What wise man, having seen the
thing that life is, can still think of joy or of pleasure? Woe upon
health which is assailed by so many maladies.” When Buddha, who was a
young prince, asked of his father the gift “that he might always remain
full of health, and that he should be smitten by no disease,” his
father, who was the king, replied: “You ask me what is impossible; in
that my son, I can do nothing.”
From that day, every religion has busied itself with the cure and
prevention of disease. They believed that the causes of these were the
influence of evil spirits or the visitations of God; and as remedies
they prescribed sacrifice and prayer and anything that might avert the
anger of God. Even at the present day, similar medicine is used by
primitive races. In Sumatra for instance, when it is impossible to
arrest the flow of blood from a wound, the disaster is ascribed to an
evil spirit (Polasièq) who is sucking the wound and making it incurable.
In Nias, when bleeding from the nose occurs in children, it is supposed
to be due to the father having killed a cock during the pregnancy of the
mother. The indispensable remedy is to make sacrifice to the outraged
deity.
No doubt there co-exist with such practices of primitive races, certain
useful rules, based on correct observation or on experience. It is a
common practice to try all manner of remedies on the sick; although most
do harm, now and again something useful may be discovered. Such vulgar
medicine has undoubted merit, but it cannot be compared with the results
of scientific medicine, which are drawn from rigorous experiment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account