The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophyMetchnikoff, Elie
Philosophy
The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophy
Metchnikoff, Elie
Human beings; Human biology; Life (Biology)
Humanity will be fortunate if the pessimistic philosophers prove as
wrong about their other grievances as they have proved about disease and
medicine. To understand the vast progress made by medicine, it is
necessary only to compare the complaint of Schopenhauer with the actual
state of affairs. When he spoke of epidemics being due to slight changes
of the atmosphere, Schopenhauer obviously was repeating the medical
opinion current in his times. Experimental science has proved that he
was quite wrong. It has been shown conclusively that two of the great
affections of which he spoke, cholera and plague, are due not to
chemical changes in the air, but to definite microbes, the natural
history of which is known as well as that of any other plant. Cholera is
produced by the vibrio, discovered by Koch, a minute organism that lives
in water and that enters the human alimentary canal with food or drink.
We do not yet know a definite cure for cholera, but we do know how to
prevent infection. The most simple mode of guarding against infection is
to swallow only material that has been boiled, and to prevent
contamination of water or of vessels with fæcal matter containing the
Koch’s vibrio. Moreover, in individual cases use may be made of
anti-cholera serums. In 1831, if these discoveries had been made,
philosophy would have taken a different course. Instead of trembling at
the epidemic, and flying to Frankfurt, Schopenhauer would have remained
quietly at Berlin, and Hegel would not have ceased to develop his
idealism in the university of that town.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account