The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophyMetchnikoff, Elie
Philosophy
The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophy
Metchnikoff, Elie
Human beings; Human biology; Life (Biology)
A year later, a well-known German physician, Dr. Ebstein[312] published
a very careful treatise on the same subject. He had been struck by the
fact that among those who have reached a great age, there have been
several who had led an exuberant life, full of excesses, notably in the
consumption of alcohol. None the less, Ebstein advised either a complete
avoidance of alcoholic liquor, or at the most an extreme temperance in
the use of it. He prescribed in addition the simplification of the
conduct of life and the avoiding of anything that is unwholesome.
Study of such works, which are written in a scientific spirit, convinces
me that a science of the prolongation of life could be built up. An
exact investigation of the phenomena of old age would contribute to this
object. At any rate, we cannot set aside as chimerical plans to make old
age a natural process, and one easy to bear. I believe, moreover, that
attempts to prolong life deserve to be encouraged, the more so as
instances of longevity are already numerous.
Quite a number of cases of centenarians who have preserved intellect and
vigour until death have been recorded. It is unnecessary to relate the
histories of these persons, of whom some attained such ages as 120, 140,
and even 185 years (Saint Mungo of Glasgow). My friend, Professor Ray
Lankester,[313] thinks that such unusually old persons are monstrosities
comparable with those who have attained a gigantic stature. But
centenarians are more numerous than giants, and while the latter exhibit
marked signs of pathological weakness the former surprise us by their
health and vigour.
The longevity of the Israelites recorded in the Old Testament is well
known. No doubt there is much exaggeration in these naïve records. Was
it an error of exaggeration to impute an age of 969 years to Methusaleh,
or of 595 to Noah, or were these ages reckoned on a different basis?
Henseler[314] suggested that in these cases each season was counted as a
year, so that the age of Methusaleh was really only 242 years, a length
of life not so vastly greater than ages recorded in modern times.
There is evidence to show that in somewhat later Biblical times ages
were reckoned in our years. Thus in the Book of Numbers (i. 3, 20, 22)
reference is made to those “From twenty years old and upward, all that
are able to go forth to war in Israel.” The limit of age given shows
clearly that the years counted were our years. This interpretation is
supported by many other passages in the Pentateuch, notably where annual
harvest feasts are spoken of. We may therefore accept as probable the
assignment of such ages as 100 or 120 years to several Biblical
personages, such as Aaron, Moses, and Joshua. And the words put in the
mouth of Jahveh may be accepted as important evidence: “And the Lord
said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is
flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.”[315]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account