The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophyMetchnikoff, Elie
Philosophy
The nature of man : $b Studies in optimistic philosophy
Metchnikoff, Elie
Human beings; Human biology; Life (Biology)
I have already referred (chap. iii.) to the discussions that have taken
place over the simian origin of man. All attempts to demonstrate the
presence in the human brain of parts that were absent in the simian
brain have failed. It is a curious fact that man displays a more marked
difference from monkeys in the structure of the reproductive system than
in the structure of the brain. There is no _os penis_ in man. This bone,
which facilitates intromission, occurs in many vertebrates, not only
among rodents and carnivora, which are widely separated from man, but in
many monkeys, and most notably in anthropoid apes.[86] For some reason
impossible to establish, man has lost this bone. It may be that certain
ossifications of most rare occurrence[87] may represent an atavistic
inheritance from our remote ancestors.
In the male sex the difference between man and the anthropoid ape is the
loss of an organ; in the female sex it is the acquisition of an organ.
The hymen, the physical indication of virginity, is peculiar to the
human race. That organ would serve the purpose of those disputants who
make every effort to discover the existence of a structure peculiarly
human, far better than the posterior lobe of the brain, or the
hippocampus minor. Bischoff[88] has determined its absence in the
anthropoid apes, and his result has been confirmed by other observers.
Deniker[89] failed to find it either in the fœtal gorilla or in the
young gorilla. In the case of the fœtus of the gibbon, he found a slight
elevation round the entrance to the vagina “which might be homologised
with the hymen,”[90] but which, however, was not the membrane in
question. Deniker[91] himself decided that the “membrane was absent in
anthropoid apes at all ages.” Weidersheim, in his summary of the
organisation of the human body,[92] also sets down the fact that “in
monkeys a hymen is not present.”
The fact that this structure appears late in the development of the
female fœtus bears out the supposition that it has been acquired
recently by the race. According to several observers, who agree in this
matter, the membrane does not develop until at least the nineteenth week
of fœtal life.
Although organs very ancient in origin, and now become degenerate
rudiments, may be useless, it is to be expected that an organ of recent
appearance and still in a progressive condition, would have an important
function. Of what utility is this membrane to a woman? Wiedersheim[93]
remarks that its function has not been made out.
The hymen sometimes plays a large part in family and social relations,
and, regarded as the evidence for virginity, has had moral significance
bestowed on it. A minute examination of this structure is frequently a
part of the judicial procedure in cases of supposed rape and so forth.
The destruction of the hymen has led to the death of many hundreds of
men and women.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account