The nature of the physical worldEddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Philosophy
The nature of the physical world
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Physics -- Philosophy; Science -- Philosophy
We have been accustomed to regard the world—the enduring world—as
stratified into a succession of instantaneous states. But an
observer on another star would make the strata run in a different
direction from ours. We shall see more clearly the real mechanism
of the physical world if we can rid our minds of this illusion of
stratification. The world that then stands revealed, though strangely
unfamiliar, is actually much simpler. There is a difference between
simplicity and familiarity. A pig may be most familiar to us in the
form of rashers, but the unstratified pig is a simpler object to the
biologist who wishes to understand how the animal functions.
Absolute Past and Future. Let us now try to attain this absolute
view. We rub out all the Now lines. We rub out Yourself and Myself,
since we are no longer essential to the world. But the Seen-Now lines
are left. They are absolute, since all observers from Here-Now agree
about them. The flat picture is a section; you must imagine it rotated
(twice rotated in fact, since there are two more dimensions outside
the picture). The Seen-Now locus is thus really a cone; or by taking
account of the prolongation of the lines into the future a double cone
[Pg 48]
or hour-glass figure (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
These hour-glasses (drawn through each point of the world considered
in turn as a Here-Now) embody what we know of the absolute structure
of the world so far as space and time are concerned. They show how the
“grain” of the world runs.
Father Time has been pictured as an old man with a scythe and an
hour-glass. We no longer permit him to mow instants through the world
with his scythe; but we leave him his hour-glass.
Since the hour-glass is absolute its two cones provide respectively an
Absolute Future and an Absolute Past for the event Here-Now. They are
separated by a wedge-shaped neutral zone which (absolutely) is neither
past nor future. The common impression that relativity turns past and
future altogether topsy-turvy is quite false. But, unlike the relative
past and future, the absolute past and future are not separated by an
infinitely narrow present. It suggests itself that the neutral wedge
[Pg 49]
might be called the Absolute Present; but I do not think that is a
good nomenclature. It is much better described as Absolute Elsewhere.
We have abolished the Now lines, and in the absolute world the present
(Now) is restricted to Here-Now.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account