The nature of the physical worldEddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Philosophy
The nature of the physical world
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Physics -- Philosophy; Science -- Philosophy
In one sense the chance of the molecules returning to one half of the
vessel is too absurdly small to think about. Yet in science we think
about it a great deal, because it gives a measure of the irrevocable
mischief we did when we casually removed the partition. Even if we had
good reasons for wanting the gas to fill the vessel there was no need
to waste the organisation; as we have mentioned, it is negotiable and
might have been passed on somewhere where it was useful.[6] When the
gas was released and began to spread across the vessel, say from left
to right, there was no immediate increase of the random element. In
order to spread from left to right, left-to-right velocities of the
molecules must have preponderated, that is to say the motion was partly
organised. Organisation of position was replaced by organisation of
motion. A moment later the molecules struck the farther wall of the
vessel and the random element began to increase. But, before it was
destroyed, the left-to-right organisation of molecular velocities was
the exact numerical equivalent of the lost organisation in space. By
that we mean that the chance against the left-to-right preponderance
of velocity occurring by accident is the same as the chance against
segregation in one half of the vessel occurring by accident.
The adverse chance here mentioned is a preposterous number which
(written in the usual decimal notation) would fill all the books in
the world many times over. We are not interested in it as a practical
contingency; but we are interested in the fact that it is definite. It
raises “organisation” from a vague descriptive epithet to one of the
measurable quantities of exact science. We are confronted with many
kinds of organisation. The uniform march of a regiment is not the only
[Pg 74]
form of organised motion; the organised evolutions of a stage chorus
have their natural analogue in sound waves. A common measure can now
be applied to all forms of organisation. Any loss of organisation is
equitably measured by the chance against its recovery by an accidental
coincidence. The chance is absurd regarded as a contingency, but it is
precise as a measure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account