The nature of the physical worldEddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Philosophy
The nature of the physical world
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, Sir
Physics -- Philosophy; Science -- Philosophy
What has happened to the theory of the earth has happened also to
the theory of the world of space-time. An observer at rest at the
earth’s centre represents what is happening in a frame of space and
time constructed on the usual conventional principles which give what
is called a flat space-time. He can locate the events in his
neighbourhood without distorting their natural simplicity. Objects at
rest remain at rest; objects in uniform motion remain in uniform motion
unless there is some evident cause of disturbance such as hammering;
light travels in straight lines. He extends this flat frame to the
surface of the earth where he encounters the phenomenon of falling
apples. This new phenomenon has to be accounted for by an intangible
agency or demon called gravitation which persuades the apples
to deviate from their proper uniform motion. But we can also start
with the frame of the falling apple or of the man in the lift. In the
lift-frame bodies at rest remain at rest; bodies in uniform motion
remain in uniform motion. But, as we have seen, even at the corners of
the lift this simplicity begins to fail; and looking further afield,
say to the centre of the earth, it is necessary to postulate the
activity of a demon urging unsupported bodies upwards (relatively to
the lift-frame). As we change from one observer to another—from one
flat space-time frame to another—the scene of activity of the demon
shifts. It is never where our observer is, but always away yonder. Is
not the solution now apparent? The demon is simply the complication
which arises when we try to fit a curved world into a flat frame. In
referring the world to a flat frame of space-time we distort it so
that the phenomena do not appear in their original simplicity. Admit a
curvature of the world and the mysterious agency disappears. Einstein
has exorcised the demon.
[Pg 119]
Do not imagine that this preliminary change of conception carries us
very far towards an explanation of gravitation. We are not
seeking an explanation; we are seeking a picture. And this picture of
world-curvature (hard though it may seem) is more graspable than an
elusive tug which flits from one object to another according to the
point of view chosen.
A New Law of Gravitation. Having found a new picture of
gravitation, we require a new law of gravitation; for the Newtonian law
told us the amount of the tug and there is now no tug to be considered.
Since the phenomenon is now pictured as curvature the new law must say
something about curvature. Evidently it must be a law governing and
limiting the possible curvature of space-time.
There are not many things which can be said about curvature—not
many of a general character. So that when Einstein felt this urgency to
say something about curvature, he almost automatically said the right
thing. I mean that there was only one limitation or law that suggested
itself as reasonable, and that law has proved to be right when tested
by observation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account