The church, being a human institution, could not disregard its
environment. It worked its way out of all the complexities of the
situation, its position varying somewhat as to section and as to sect.
With the exception of the Friends, there was very little difference
in the attitude of the Protestants toward slavery, until after the
Revolution. They were, in general, anti-slavery in sentiment, were
willing to baptize slaves and receive them into the church. The Friends
in this early period were the only religious body in America that saw any
inconsistency in Christians holding slaves.[2] There were a great many
slave communicants in all the churches prior to the Revolution.[3]
The general background can be made a bit more specific for Tennessee
by particular reference to the relation of the churches to slavery in
Colonial North Carolina since this was the parent state of Tennessee.
The Lord Proprietors in the Fundamental Constitution of 1663 declared
that conversion did not free nor enfranchise the negro.[4] This provision
was kept in the new constitution of 1698.[5] It is noticeable here
that this was primarily a political question—a question of freedom and
suffrage—a question of state, not of church. The state was declaring
its right to state the effect of conversion on the slave. It is well to
note this point in the beginning, because the splits and schisms in the
various churches in the period immediately preceding the Civil War came
up over this point. James Adams, a clergyman, of the Episcopal Church
of North Carolina, declared in 1709 that the masters would “by no means
permit (their slaves) to be baptized, having a false notion that a
Christian slave is by law free.”[6]
This attitude of the slaveholders did not last long in North Carolina,
because Rev. Marsden in 1735 speaks of baptizing at Cape Fear “about
1300 men, women, and children, besides some negro slaves.”[7] In 1742 a
missionary speaks of baptizing nine negro slaves.[8] Through a series of
missionary reports, it is noticeable that, as the idea becomes fixed,
that baptism does not free the slaves nor give them the suffrage, the
number of baptized blacks increases. In 1765, a report speaks of 40
blacks that were baptized[9]; another report, 46;[10] and a third,
51.[11] In 1771 a report states that 65 were taken into the church and
in 1772 a Rev. Taylor states that in thirteen months he had baptized 174
whites and 168 blacks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account