The New Forest: Its History and Its SceneryWise, John R. (John Richard)
History
The New Forest: Its History and Its Scenery
Wise, John R. (John Richard)
New Forest (England : Forest)
Long after this the Isle of Wight was altogether separated by the Solent
from the mainland, but still ages before the historic period. The
various traditions, as to the former depth of the channel, how Sir
Bevis, of Southampton, waded across it, how, too, the carts brought the
Binstead stone for building Beaulieu Abbey over the dry bed at low
water, have been previously given. The passage, too, in Diodorus Siculus
has been already examined,[265] and there can be no doubt,
notwithstanding his also making it, like the traditions, a peninsula at
low water, that his Ictis is the Isle of Wight and not St. Michael’s
Mount. The mere local evidence of the mass of tin, the British road—more
like a deep trench than a road—still plainly traceable across the
Forest, the names along it corresponding with that of its continuation
in the Island, would alone, most assuredly, show that this was the place
whence the first traders, and, in after-times, the Romans, exported
their tin. We must, however, remember that the channel of the Solent was
caused by depression rather than by excavation; and that at this moment
an alteration in the levels, as noticed by Mr. Austen,[266] is going on
eastward of Hurst Castle.
The drift, which spreads over the whole of the New Forest, is not very
interesting. No elephants’ tusks, or elks’ horns, so far as I know, have
ever been discovered. A few species of _Terebratula_ and _Pecten_, some
flint knives, and the _os inominatum_, of probably _Bos longifrons_,
mentioned farther on, are the only things at present found. Still, in
one way, it is most interesting, as completely disproving the
Chroniclers’ accounts that, before its afforestation by the Conqueror,
the district of the Forest was so fertile. The fact is a sheer
impossibility. No wheat could ever be grown on this great bed of
chalk-gravel, which is varied only by patches of sand.
But nowhere, perhaps, in the world can we see the stratification of the
upper portion of the Middle-Eocene better than at Hordle and Barton, as
the sea serves to keep the different strata exposed. The beds dip
easterly with a fall of about one in a hundred, though, at the extreme
west, at High Cliff, it is much less, and here and there in some few
places they lie almost horizontally.[267] At Hordle they seem to have
been deposited in a river of a very uniform depth. There is but one
single fault in the whole series, just under Mead End, where all the
beds have alike suffered. Here and there, however, they are deposited
with an undulating line; and here and there, too, a rippled surface
occurs, caused by the action of small waves. The river appears to have
varied very much in the amount and force of its stream, as some of the
beds, where the shells are less frequent, have been deposited very
rapidly, whilst others, where the organic remains are more abundant,
have been laid on very slowly and in very still water.[268]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account