The New Forest: Its History and Its SceneryWise, John R. (John Richard)
History
The New Forest: Its History and Its Scenery
Wise, John R. (John Richard)
New Forest (England : Forest)
[81]Dugdale’s _Monasticon Anglicanum_. Ed 1825, vol. v., p. 682. Num.
ii. See _Chronica de Kirkstall_. Brit. Mus. Cott. MSS. Domitian. A.
xii., ff. 85, 86. The cause of John’s enmity against the Cistercian
Order may be gathered from Ralph Coggeshale, _Chronicon Anglicanum_,
as before in Bouquet, _Recueil des Historiens des Gaules et de la
France_, tom. xviii. pp. 90, 91.
[82]_Carta Fundationis per Regem Johannem_, given in Dugdale (Ed. 1825,
vol. v. p. 683); and _Confirmacio Regis Edwardi tertii super cartas
Regis Johannis_, Brit. Mus., Bib. Cott. Nero, A. xii., No. v., ff.
8-15, quoted in Warner (_South-West Parts of Hampshire_, vol. ii.,
Appendix, pp. 7-14). There are, however, no less than three dates
given for its foundation. The _Annals of Parcolude_, according to
Tanner (_Notitia Monastica_, Ed. Nasmyth, Hampshire, No. vi.
foot-note _h_), say 1201, which is manifestly wrong; whilst John of
Oxnede, better known as the chronicler of St. Benet’s Abbey at Hulme
(_Chronica._ Ed. Ellis, p. 107), with the _Chronicon de Hayles et
Aberconwey_ (Brit. Mus., Harl. MS., No. 3725, f. 10), and Matthew
Paris, according to Dugdale, say respectively 1204 and 1205, though
I have not been able to verify the last reference.
[83]_Roger of Wendover._ English Historical Society. Ed. Coxe, vol. iii.
p. 344.
[84]See the previous chapter, pp. 57, 58, foot-note.
[85]Curiously enough, as Warner remarks (vol. i. 267), Matthew Paris
gives two dates for the dedication, the first 1246 (_Hist. Angl._,
tom. i. p. 710, Ed. Wats., London, 1640); and the second (p. 770)
1249; not, however, 1250, as Warner says, and who, followed by all
later writers, totally misunderstands the passage, which means that,
although the abbot spent so large a sum, yet the King would not
remit him the fine he had incurred by trespass in the Forest,—“Nec
tamen idcirco aliquatenus pepercit rex, quin maximum censum solveret
illi pro transgressione quam dicebatur regi fecisse in occupatione
Forestæ.”
[86]See Matthew Paris, in praise of the Cistercian Order. Same edition
as before, tom. i. p. 916.
[87]Not Margaret of Anjou, as the common accounts say, who, landing at
Weymouth, took refuge at Cerne Abbey. See _Historie of the Arrival
of Edward IV. in England_, pp. 22, 23, printed for the Camden
Society, 1838; and Hollinshed’s _Chronicles_, vol. iii. p. 685; and
_Speed_, B. ix. p. 866. Hall, however (_The Union of the Families of
Lancaster and York_, p. 219), with Grafton, in his prose
continuation of Hardyng (Ed. Ellis, 1812, p. 457), says it was to
Beaulieu that Margaret fled. But they are evidently mistaken, as
Speed and Hollinshed, and the explicit and circumstantial narrative
of the author of the _Historie_, show.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account