The New Forest: Its History and Its SceneryWise, John R. (John Richard)
History
The New Forest: Its History and Its Scenery
Wise, John R. (John Richard)
New Forest (England : Forest)
[199]I may seem to exaggerate both here and in the next chapter. I wish
that I did. For similar cases in the neighbouring counties of Dorset
and Sussex let the reader turn to the words “hag-rod,”
“maiden-tree,” and “viary-rings,” in Mr. Barnes’s _Glossary of the
Dorset Dialect_; and vol. ii. pp. 266, 269, 270, 278, of Mr.
Warter’s _Seaboard and the Down_. I hesitate not to say that
superstition in some sort or another is universal throughout
England. It assumes different forms: in the higher classes, just at
present, of spirit-rapping and table-turning, more gross than even
those of the lower; and I am afraid really seems constitutional in
our English nature.
[200]Of the extreme difficulty of classification of race in the New
Forest I am well aware. I have, however, taken such typical families
as Purkis, Peckham, Watton, &c., whose names are to be met in every
part of the Forest, as my guide. Often, too, certain Forest
villages, as Burley and Minestead, though far apart, have a strong
connection with each other, and a family relationship may be traced
in all the cottages. A good paper was read, touching upon the
elements of the New Forest population, by Mr. D. Mackintosh, before
the Ethnological Society, April 3rd, 1861. Of the Jute element,
which we might have expected from Bede’s account of the large Jute
settlement in the Isle of Wight, and Florence of Worcester’s
language (as before, ed. Thorpe, vol. i., p. 276), few traces are to
be found. See, however, on this point, what Latham says in his
_Ethnology of the British Isles_, pp. 238, 239.
[201]See Dr. Guest’s paper on “The Early-English Settlements in South
Britain,” _Proceedings of the Archæological Institute_, Salisbury
volume, 1851, p. 30.
[202]This, of course, is not the place to go into so difficult a
subject. I need not refer the reader to Mr. Davies’s paper in the
_Philological Society’s Transactions_, 1855, p. 210, and M. de Haan
Hettema’s _Commentary_ upon it, 1856, p. 196. On the great value of
provincialisms, see what Müller has said in _The Science of
Language_, pp. 49-59. In Appendix I., I have given a list of some of
those of the New Forest, which have never before been noticed in any
of the published glossaries.
[203]In the charter of confirmation of Baldwin de Redvers to the
Conventual House of Christchurch, quoted in Dugdale’s _Monasticon
Anglicanum_, vol. iii., part i., p. 304, and by Warner, vol. ii.,
Appendix, p. 47, it is called Hedenes Buria, which may suggest that
the word is only a corruption. I do not for one moment wish to
insist on the personal reality of Hengest, but simply to notice the
fact of the High-German word for a horse being prominent in the
topography of a people whose ancestors used so many High-German
words. See Donaldson, _Cambridge Essays_, 1856, pp. 45-48.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account