Germany -- History -- Revolution, 1918; Germany -- Politics and government -- 1918-1933
and millions in expeditions to subject frontier provinces to their
racial and religious enemies, than try to subjugate all Germany to our
imperial system as we apparently aspire to do in the economic and
financial clauses.
In the international region also the Treaty has similarly stultified
itself. It depends for its execution on the acceptance by Germany not
only of its provisions but of the principles on which it is based.
These principles assume that Germany will conform Constitutionally to
the European system that we are setting up. That is that Germany will
have a parliamentary government in which the upper and middle classes
will preponderate. This Germany was quite prepared to do, and regarded
its revolution chiefly as the qualification for admission to the
Allied system on an equal footing. Parliamentary Government meant to
Germany last winter not so much liberty as equality and
fraternity--equality in the world's markets and fraternity in a League
of Nations. In other words, peace and food. When Germany found that it
was to be excluded from the League and outlawed, parliamentary
government _à l'anglaise_ was left without a leg to stand on. It lost
its right leg because nationalists reverted to militarism and its left
leg because internationalists turned towards Sovietism. It can fairly
be said that the Weimar Assembly and the National Government that
signed the Treaty of Peace represented no German force but merely
German weakness. If the Treaty is ever to be enforced it can only be
so through the Reichstag, and what it stands for, and yet the Treaty
has gone out of its way to weaken the Reichstag.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account