Germany -- History -- Revolution, 1918; Germany -- Politics and government -- 1918-1933
Already the internationalism of Germany and Central Europe is under
the pressure of Paris, taking a form almost impossible to reconcile
with the form of this League of Nations. Until the appearance of the
Paris project for the League and the peace conditions, Germany,
whether national or international, was wholeheartedly a supporter of
it. But now it is not too much to say that the League is moribund, not
only in Germany, but in continental Europe generally, as an ideal. Its
place is rapidly being taken by the ideal of an International Council
on a basis of social and industrial representation, instead of that of
a League on a basis of national or territorial representation. Just as
the leaders of the German workmen and the younger Democrats caught at
the theories of Guild Socialism, so now they are turning eagerly to a
new idea, also introduced from England, of an international Soviet
system--an organisation that will be really international because,
instead of being based as is the Wilsonian League on the nationalism
of States, it will be based on the internationalism of trades. That
will have as its sanction an international strike instead of a
national boycott, and as its authority a Central Council of delegates
instead of a Conference of diplomats. This development would have come
in due course anyway, but a successful Wilsonian League might have
delayed it even as the prestige of the House of Commons is delaying
Council government, and as the prestige of the Crown delayed
Parliamentary government itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account